Your Tea Party derangement seems to be getting worse by the day. You are posting from some alternate universe.

Yes, you don’t need the support and votes of lifelong Republicans. Just let them stay home…

Again, that attitude against the traditional Republican faithful is the core reason the Republicans lost this year. And will keep losing until they wise up.

So now a lifelong Republican is a “Progressive Leftist” because he dares to speak against the “Great and Noble” Tea Party Republicans and how they are destroying the party.

And there is the core reason why the Republicans lost.

Instead of the Tea Party Republicans reaching out to expand their voter base they spend their time isolating themselves by insulting life-long Republicans who disagree with their narrow views. And who, like myself, have been pointing out since 2010 that all they are doing with their narrow views and attitudes is ensuring President Obama would be re-elected.

And I was right. The Tea Party Republican attitudes and tactics kept “A” Team Republicans like Governor Daniels and Governor Christie from running while driving Governor Pawlenty and Governor Johnson from the race. And likely kept many Republican voters home, seeing no reason to vote for a party that insists on insulting them.

You aren’t by any chance moving to the racist Right, are you?

Maybe the Mrs? She is reportedly “beyond furious”. Can’t blame her.

“Isn’t is wonderful to see the Progressive Left so concerned with the well being of their “enemies” that they are willing to offer up after-the-fact advice on what said “enemies” should of done to win. ”

My response to them is:

You and MfK are both asserting that I think Romney is the enemy. I was assuring MfK, and now you too, that I think Romney is a swell guy. McCain is too. They aren’t my enemies. They are moderate and thoughtful and I just disagree with them on some issues. They both became less moderate during the election as they tried to appeal the Republican base, but McCain quickly went back to normal, and I’m sure Romney will too, if we hear from him again.

I look forward to the next four years in their giving the Community-Organizer-in-Chief and his lackeys similar advice on how they could’ve avoided all the scandals that are already torpedoing any second-term agenda He might have had. (An agenda in which the highest priority is probably finding more time to spend on the golf links.)

So, guys, instead of telling us who McDole should’ve picked for a VP, how about telling us how Hillary! could’ve avoided her upcoming Contempt of Congress citation? And will what works for Holder work for her?