An interesting historical perspective.
James Cameron, Call Your Office
He’s going to have to redo the movie, if he wants to get it right.
Molecular Manufacturing Breakthrough
Researchers have been able to achieve electrowetting of nanotubes with mercury. If they can do it with other metals at higher temperatures, it could lead to reliable nanowires.
Where’s Amnesty International?
Jeez.
Where’s Amnesty International?
Jeez.
Where’s Amnesty International?
Jeez.
Smokescreen?
If true, this could explain Congressman Murtha’s recent behavior:
Zieve…dug up a recent editorial appearing in Investor
The Non-Science Of “Intelligent Design”
Need I say more?
The Templeton Foundation, a major supporter of projects seeking to reconcile science and religion, says that after providing a few grants for conferences and courses to debate intelligent design, they asked proponents to submit proposals for actual research.
“They never came in,” said Charles L. Harper Jr., senior vice president at the Templeton Foundation, who said that while he was skeptical from the beginning, other foundation officials were initially intrigued and later grew disillusioned.
“From the point of view of rigor and intellectual seriousness, the intelligent design people don’t come out very well in our world of scientific review,” he said.
The article also claims that even evangelical colleges are getting disillusioned.
[Via (admitted conservative) John Derbyshire]
Blogger John Farrell has a suggestion for Dr. Behe.
[Monday morning update]
More thoughts on the sterility of Intelligent Design as science:
If we continue with Behe
The Non-Science Of “Intelligent Design”
Need I say more?
The Templeton Foundation, a major supporter of projects seeking to reconcile science and religion, says that after providing a few grants for conferences and courses to debate intelligent design, they asked proponents to submit proposals for actual research.
“They never came in,” said Charles L. Harper Jr., senior vice president at the Templeton Foundation, who said that while he was skeptical from the beginning, other foundation officials were initially intrigued and later grew disillusioned.
“From the point of view of rigor and intellectual seriousness, the intelligent design people don’t come out very well in our world of scientific review,” he said.
The article also claims that even evangelical colleges are getting disillusioned.
[Via (admitted conservative) John Derbyshire]
Blogger John Farrell has a suggestion for Dr. Behe.
[Monday morning update]
More thoughts on the sterility of Intelligent Design as science:
If we continue with Behe
The Non-Science Of “Intelligent Design”
Need I say more?
The Templeton Foundation, a major supporter of projects seeking to reconcile science and religion, says that after providing a few grants for conferences and courses to debate intelligent design, they asked proponents to submit proposals for actual research.
“They never came in,” said Charles L. Harper Jr., senior vice president at the Templeton Foundation, who said that while he was skeptical from the beginning, other foundation officials were initially intrigued and later grew disillusioned.
“From the point of view of rigor and intellectual seriousness, the intelligent design people don’t come out very well in our world of scientific review,” he said.
The article also claims that even evangelical colleges are getting disillusioned.
[Via (admitted conservative) John Derbyshire]
Blogger John Farrell has a suggestion for Dr. Behe.
[Monday morning update]
More thoughts on the sterility of Intelligent Design as science:
If we continue with Behe