…it would be a shame if something were to happen to it.”
The so-called “moderate Muslim leadership” in Britain is blackmailing the British government again:
The closure of mosques accused of “fomenting extremism” would amount to a collective punishment of the community, the statement warned.
It may “create fear” which could lead to “the very radical sub-culture which we all seek to prevent”.
Finally, the Muslim leaders said plans to deport foreign nationals to countries known for human rights abuses was “abhorrent”.
In other words, Britain had better continue to allow people to foment insurrection and religious hatred against non-Muslims, or there might be even more insurrection and religious hatred against non-Muslims. And Britain is apparently obliged to provide asylum to people who abuse that privilege to preach hatred against her.
…it would be a shame if something were to happen to it.”
The so-called “moderate Muslim leadership” in Britain is blackmailing the British government again:
The closure of mosques accused of “fomenting extremism” would amount to a collective punishment of the community, the statement warned.
It may “create fear” which could lead to “the very radical sub-culture which we all seek to prevent”.
Finally, the Muslim leaders said plans to deport foreign nationals to countries known for human rights abuses was “abhorrent”.
In other words, Britain had better continue to allow people to foment insurrection and religious hatred against non-Muslims, or there might be even more insurrection and religious hatred against non-Muslims. And Britain is apparently obliged to provide asylum to people who abuse that privilege to preach hatred against her.
…it would be a shame if something were to happen to it.”
The so-called “moderate Muslim leadership” in Britain is blackmailing the British government again:
The closure of mosques accused of “fomenting extremism” would amount to a collective punishment of the community, the statement warned.
It may “create fear” which could lead to “the very radical sub-culture which we all seek to prevent”.
Finally, the Muslim leaders said plans to deport foreign nationals to countries known for human rights abuses was “abhorrent”.
In other words, Britain had better continue to allow people to foment insurrection and religious hatred against non-Muslims, or there might be even more insurrection and religious hatred against non-Muslims. And Britain is apparently obliged to provide asylum to people who abuse that privilege to preach hatred against her.
This is an interesting breakthrough in energy generation, but I doubt it will be practical for transportation. Though it does bring a whole new meaning to the old urban myth about running a car on water. In this case, beer might be more effective, as long as someone else was behind the wheel.
Food scientists working for the US military have developed a dried food ration that troops can hydrate by adding the filthiest of muddy swamp water or even peeing on it.
This is an interesting breakthrough in energy generation, but I doubt it will be practical for transportation. Though it does bring a whole new meaning to the old urban myth about running a car on water. In this case, beer might be more effective, as long as someone else was behind the wheel.
Food scientists working for the US military have developed a dried food ration that troops can hydrate by adding the filthiest of muddy swamp water or even peeing on it.
This is an interesting breakthrough in energy generation, but I doubt it will be practical for transportation. Though it does bring a whole new meaning to the old urban myth about running a car on water. In this case, beer might be more effective, as long as someone else was behind the wheel.
Food scientists working for the US military have developed a dried food ration that troops can hydrate by adding the filthiest of muddy swamp water or even peeing on it.
“President Bush, if your own two daughters won’t enlist, how can you expect anyone else’s children to join the military?”
This is like the idiocy of Michael Moore demanding the same thing of Bill O’Reilly. It presupposes that “children” join the military, and fantasizes that this happens because parents “send” them. Surely this formulation helps play into the little passion play we’re seeing down in Crawford right now, but it has no correspondence to reality. In this country, adults join the military, and they do so voluntarily. Many (indeed, most) of them have parents, but this is presumably a choice made by those adults, and not the parents, so this whole notion of “sending our children to war” is nonsensical.
Does he really expect the president to order Jenna and Barbara to enlist? If not, what’s his point? This isn’t about “people’s children” joining the military–it’s about people joining the military who happen (on occasion) to have parents. But that reality apparently doesn’t jerk the heartstrings as much.
The propellant combinations WFNA/ JP-4 and later IRFNA/JP-4 were the first storable systems given serious consideration in the United States. Problems which caused the abandoning of these propellants were the absence of reliable hypergolic ignition and unstable combustion. IRFNA/UDMH and IRFNA/JP-X finally did prove satisfactory.
By the late 1950’s it was apparent that N2O4 by itself was a better oxidiser. Therefore nitric acid was almost entirely replaced by pure N2O4 in storable liquid fuel rocket engines developed after 1960.
Apparently it was so apparent that they have no need to explain why it was so apparent. What was the benefit of going from nitric acid to tetroxide for hypergolics? What was “better” about it? Anyone know?