Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« But Still No Material Breach | Main | Unfamiliar With The Concept »

The End Game Approaches

I heard the French ambassador say at the UN today that France doesn't believe that a second resolution is necessary. On that, they apparently agree with the US-led coalition (though Tony Blair would still like one to provide him a little political cover at home).

Of course, they disagree with our (correct) position that the present one, 1441, allows us to go in and remove Saddam and his weapons by force. They have made it abundantly clear that they never meant for that resolution to be taken seriously--that it was simply a means of buying time last fall until they could come up with another means of buying time. In so doing, they continue to render the UN increasingly irrelevant, because it's also abundantly clear that Saddam is so far beyond being in material breach at this point that he can't even see it from where he is, sans a gravitational lens.

It would be nice, for Blair's sake, if they can get a resolution passed, or at least get a majority for one, with a French veto. The latter would probably finally get the British public firmly on the PM's side. But either way, it's hard to believe that we won't be actively sanitizing the once-Fertile Crescent of dictators and WMD within a couple weeks.

Posted by Rand Simberg at February 27, 2003 06:02 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/848

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

Ops in Iraq should start on the next new moon so we can have the cover of darkness. If we wait again we will have to wait for the following new moon on March 31st. That puts us one month closer to the summer heat. By the time summer comes we need to be firmly covering the entirety of Iraq with forces, ours and whoever else will be willing to go. By years end we need to be well along in turning Iraq into a country with a democratically elected govermnent.

Perhaps we can set about starting, and I use a phrase much heard in my youth, a Domino Effect, of Democracy in the Middle East!! Surely democracies and free markets will prevail in an area rich in oil and silica sand.


Posted by

Posted by Steve at February 28, 2003 08:10 AM

I wouldn't count on free markets blossoming without help. The usual trend for countries possessing oil is to socialize the pumps, and have the government use the oil revenue to pay for free services. They Iraqis are going to be mighty tempted to do just that.

Posted by Dean Esmay at March 1, 2003 03:44 AM

I'm not at all certain that we'll begin under cover of darkness this time -- just because that's expected, if for no other reason.

This war won't look like any of the previous ones; remember, we've already taken out much/most of Saddam's antiaircraft defenses, and the covert ground operations have been going on for a long time. EMP bombs would be most impressive in the daytime -- more magic for the visually-insignificant daytime detonation. And then there are all the things which haven't really ben discussed yet...

I think Rand's right: a couple of weeks.

Posted by Troy at March 1, 2003 12:15 PM

Operations would probably begin on some side of the new moon rather than right on it for the simple reason that most night vision scopes require some background light to work, and although starlight suffices for some of them, many need more. Thus, IIRC, the U.S. favors launching assaults on either the nights immediately before or just after the new moon.

Posted by Jeff Dougherty at March 1, 2003 04:45 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: