Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Dising Speling | Main | The Failed Paradigm That Won't Die »

Limited Posting Continues

As regular readers have noticed, I haven't posted in a few days. I was working seventy-hour weeks, and Thursday was my first day off since November 6th. I'm decompressing this weekend, and don't have a lot to say right now. Things should be calming down for a while--though I'm still working full time for at least another week, it won't be at burnout pace, and I may have time to start posting again. I will note that I got an email from Jim Oberg about the recent unexplained sound on the ISS, subject: Ignorance is Bliss.

He thinks that NASA is being entirely too nonchalant about this, particularly in light of what happened last February:

Seems like NASA has decided that since they can't figure out what caused that alarming noise, they are justified in assuming it can't be dangerous. I'm particularly amused by Foale's assurances that "It was a sound, but nothing happened after that. I think everything is OK," which reminds me of his famous quote before arriving at Mir in 1997, "I'm not worried about it -- the safety is perfectly assured."

No news mention of the elevated background noise in the SM -- if both crewmen distinctly heard something, it had to have been LOUD. No news mention that major portions of the SM exterior were not observable by the SSRMS cameras ("If the parts we can see have no damage, we can assume the parts we can't see are the same"). No mention that if the noise WAS a fan internal debris impact, there should be checkable, verifiable consequences (power surge, debris in line, hole in in-going filter, off-balance blade flutter, etc.) that have not apparently been even looked for.

A friend of mine who served on a nuclear submarine tells me that unusual sounds were usually the first clues they ever got -- even ahead of instrumentation readings -- of mechanical malfunction, and they worked VERY hard to track down their causes -- they NEVER just assumed that if they couldn't figure it out, it was 'probably harmless'. This may indeed have been harmless, but forgive me for being unimpressed with the apparent nonchalent holiday-relaxed NASA reaction to it, even after they claim to "get it" about ignoring signs that Columbia was in trouble.

Posted by Rand Simberg at November 29, 2003 04:28 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/1943

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
ISS Noise Not Debris
Excerpt: Looks like NASA has been continuing to take this incident seriously, but are they taking it seriously enough? I don't know, but I don't think we've heard the last of it (no pun intended)....
Weblog: Spacecraft
Tracked: December 1, 2003 02:28 PM
ISS Noise Not Debris
Excerpt: Looks like NASA has been continuing to take this incident seriously, but are they taking it seriously enough? I don't know, but I don't think we've heard the last of it (no pun intended). UPDATE: Well, I guess this explains...
Weblog: Spacecraft
Tracked: December 1, 2003 07:10 PM
Comments

Nasawatch is reporting they are using national assets to check the station exterior.

Posted by Mike Puckett at November 29, 2003 05:14 PM

His comments made me remember why I support the U.S. militarization of space. The U.S. Military (maybe the USAF or USMC), having military and strategic objectives would be more likely to excel at space exploration and development of related technologies. NASA any more seems like any other non military government agency... inefficient and mostly a waste of tax-payer dollars.

Posted by Jerry Carter at November 30, 2003 07:42 PM

Ah, someone's making the submarine connection. Now there'd be an interesting experiment. Take an old boomer, gut it of weaponry and put in stuff to aid a prolonged habitation. Pick a crew and put it to sea for a year-long submerged cruise allowing only water to be brought on board. Everything else to be either stored or grown onboard.

Posted by John S Allison at December 1, 2003 07:21 AM

mrojky kdnvoaz vsah kfmy wdmap hxaqgtjr zsbh

Posted by ylhvdj kmiradltx at December 1, 2006 03:23 PM

mrojky kdnvoaz vsah kfmy wdmap hxaqgtjr zsbh

Posted by ylhvdj kmiradltx at December 1, 2006 03:24 PM

mrojky kdnvoaz vsah kfmy wdmap hxaqgtjr zsbh

Posted by ylhvdj kmiradltx at December 1, 2006 03:24 PM

tpiavl edtubmv krbszijdx rlhs gxfkclsp vuhikn lktj

Posted by scdhawi ziuadht at December 3, 2006 06:31 AM

tpiavl edtubmv krbszijdx rlhs gxfkclsp vuhikn lktj

Posted by scdhawi ziuadht at December 3, 2006 06:33 AM

tpiavl edtubmv krbszijdx rlhs gxfkclsp vuhikn lktj

Posted by scdhawi ziuadht at December 3, 2006 06:34 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: