Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« How Many Excess Deaths? | Main | Around The Corner? »

But It Checqued Out Fine

This probably isn't news to people who are both good writers and use MS Word, but its grammar checker sucks.

I personally find it a frustrating mix of useful and extremely annoying. It does occasionally catch a word I misspell (something that I do rarely), but it almost never gives me good grammar advice. Ninety percent of the time (probably more) its recommended changes are either of no value, or would actually be wrong (I notice in particular that it has problems recognizing subjects and objects when recommending singular or plural forms of irregular verbs). I'll probably keep using it, but given my writing style, I wish that I could disable the "long sentence, no suggestions" feature, because that's the one that I most often get false alarms with.

Anyway, as the article says, if you're a student (or worker) and think that your product is spelled correctly and grammatical just because Microsoft says so, think again. There's still no substitute for a human editor, whether yourself or, if you're unsure, another.

[Via Geek Press]

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 30, 2005 06:31 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/3585

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

What version of Word are you using? In 2003, at least, there is fairly granular control of the Grammar and Style checker.

1) In the Tools Menu, select Options.
2) Click the Grammar Tab.
3) There is a pull-down menu to select "Grammar Only" or "Grammar & Style." Underneath, there is a button for "Grammar Settings." You can choose what you want Word to check. For example, under Style there's "Sentence Length" and "Sentence Structure."

I use Grammar Only, and don't have many problems.

Posted by Eric J at March 30, 2005 07:20 AM

Rand, have you seen this poem?

Eye Halve a Spelling Chequer

Posted by Astrosmith at March 30, 2005 07:28 AM

I'm using Office 97...

So I suppose I shouldn't be commenting on their latest efforts. But my experience seems to match that described in the linked article.

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 30, 2005 07:52 AM

Looking at my configuration, I don't see an option referring to long sentences, so I can't turn that particular one off without just turning off grammar checking.

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 30, 2005 07:56 AM

It depends on how you use it. I keep the grammar check turned on, even though it rarely offers good advice. But when it does flag something I'll eyeball it, just to see if the sentence can be improved. About 40% of the time, I'd estimate, I'll change a flagged sentence, though rarely the way the grammar checker suggests.

Having the grammar checker on is like having a very stupid person looking over your shoulder. Even though they're dumb, at least they're a second pair of eyes. And that much I appreciate.

Posted by conscientious objector at March 30, 2005 09:17 AM

Having the grammar checker on is like having a very stupid person looking over your shoulder. Even though they're dumb, at least they're a second pair of eyes. And that much I appreciate.

Yeah, that's why I'll keep using it. But I wish I could at least train the idiot to stop telling me my sentences are too long (even if, occasionally, they are).

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 30, 2005 09:50 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: