Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Routing Around It | Main | Slow-Motion Train Wreck »

Terabyte Drives

Hitachi says they're on the way, soon. Finally, room for my cheesy SF movie collection in one place.

Posted by Rand Simberg at April 04, 2005 08:05 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/3609

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

Why don't you just buy one of these? Almost 2 TB on effectively one disk (as far as the operating system is concerned) with redundancy and already shipping.

Posted by Annoying Old Guy at April 4, 2005 10:48 AM

Because it takes up at least 2 1/2 times as much space as using a comparable 1 TB drive that's being proposed?

You can build rather large RAID arrays "as far as the OS is concerned", but that doesn't mean that they take up as little room as a 3.5" drive that can hold a full terabyte worth of data.

Logical volumes mean nothing if they take up gobs of physical space.

Posted by John Breen III at April 4, 2005 01:30 PM

I guess it depends on what you mean by "gobs of space". The thing's smaller than the subwoofers on most gaming systems. You could pair the raid with one of these and together the two would take up less space than a standard desktop system but quieter and with less heat problems.

Posted by Annoying Old Guy at April 4, 2005 06:30 PM

My primary home box currently has 1/3 terabytes of storage. I'm planning on putting together an A/V library machine with two 400 GB Seagate drives. The tentative name for the box is "Memory Alpha." I already have a Pioneer 300 disk DVD/CD changer. The effective data storage in that is over a terabyte.

Yes, it is fun watching the capacity go up. I still have an Apple 5 1/2 inch 140 KB capacity drive around somewhere. When I bought it in 1980, it cost over $600. I remember thinking how much storage that was. Literally over a hundred KB! Wow! And wouldn't it be neat to have a WHOLE MEGABYTE on one disk. Whoa!

Posted by VR at April 4, 2005 07:26 PM

The really hard question is, how is this data going to be backed up? That's one reason I like a RAID instead of one big disk. But even a RAID won't save you from inappropriate deletion of data (fumble fingers or a virus).

Posted by Annoying Old Guy at April 5, 2005 07:27 AM

how is this data going to be backed up? How did people back up data when they first came out with a 1 GB drive?

Probably the same way data is backed up nowadays, with RAID arrays and other drives. When 1 TB drives are plentiful, it doesn't take much of a leap to put more than one into a RAID and back up the data real-time, especially if bus throughputs (like SATA) can keep a reasonable pace with space increases.

Posted by John Breen III at April 5, 2005 01:50 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: