It was quite amusing tonight to watch "Fox News Watch," a show supposedly based on analysis of media performance, and to see the two libs on the panel, Neil Gabler and Jane Hall, dissing Judy Miller, as apparently the traitor to the cause. I was a little disappointed that one of the two supposedly "conservative" panelists (Cal Thomas or Jim Pinkerton) didn't call them on it, and ask them directly who they thought she was protecting, because it's clear to me that they're deluding themselves that she's protecting Karl Rove.

Am I the only one who sees the obvious; Joe Wilson was the leaker. His motivation was simple; to give credibility to his report. Strong evidence of this is Wilson's latest statements that his wife wasn't undercover when they made their trip.

No. I've thought much the same thing all along.

The first time I saw Joe Wilson on TV, he struck me as a media drama queen who enjoyed his role a bit too much. It made me think of "Munchausen's by proxy" -- is there a political equivalent of that? If not, maybe the Wilsons can serve as the defining case study.