CNN thinks that the lead of the story is the low turnout for the anti-anti-America protestors.

If the ocassional snipets of CNN I catch are any indication, they've gone fully into PR arm of the Democratic Party mode. Personally, I consider the left/right fracture of the info-tainment industry to be a good thing. The notion that the major news sources were fair and unbiased has always been a false one, so in that respect they've become more truthful. Now if they'd admit it openly, we'd really get somewhere, because the next step is asking "Okay, so where can I get just the facts, please?"

I just love CNN for such coverages.Keep going....Way to go CNN....

When I visited the CNN page the link to the story was labelled something along the lines of "Hundreds, not thousands, attend pro-Iraq war protest". Now isn't that a nice and balanced headline? I mean, when covering the anti-war protests, does CNN remind us that "Thousands, not millions, attend anti-war protest"?

Just amazing! So they report:

37 percent approved or leaned toward approval of how Bush has handled the situation in Iraq; strong disapproval outweighed strong approval by 2-1, 46 percent to 22 percent.

But doesn't that mean 59% approve in some way? Surely in a democracy 59% approval means we did the right thing? Basically, as this says is that if you are against the war, you really mean it...

I was a teenager during much of the Vietnam war and I don't remember any "we support the troops" type protests at all. May be a sign of the times. "Silent majority ain't bein' silent any more."

No wonder CNN has lost its spot the FOXNEWS you cant trust what the Communist News Network ever says and its owned by DADDY GREENBUCKS