Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« The New Dark Ages | Main | Sauce For The Gander »

Wireless Problems

Is there a WPA expert in the house?

I can't get my (new) Hawking PCI network adaptor to work with it. I'm using WPA-PSK, and I want to use a robust pass phrase, and I do in my D-Link DI-524 router (34 characters), but when I enter it into the client, it lops off everything after the first eight characters. And even when I shorten the phrase to eight characters on the router to get it to match, it still doesn't work. The options that I have on the PCI adaptor are WPA2 and "Any WPA," and I have the same problem with both of them. I'd really like to get a wireless network going here, but I don't trust WEP. (Note, it works fine unencrypted.)

Does anyone have any thoughts?

Posted by Rand Simberg at November 06, 2005 11:01 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/4458

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

This is going to be a little vague, and I apologize for that, but I don't have a router in front of me to give more specifics.

Somewhere in the configuration of the client software there should be an option to set the key size in bits. I vaguely remember this from a Hawking USB adapter but it's 600 miles away so I can't look it up for you.

Posted by Rick C at November 6, 2005 12:13 PM

Toss the D-Link and get a Linksys

:)

Dennis

Posted by Dennis Ray Wingo at November 6, 2005 12:52 PM

Limit the connections to MAC addreses and dump the WPA and WEP.

Posted by Joe Schmoe at November 6, 2005 03:54 PM

Why? It's too easy for a blackhat to sniff out and spoof a MAC address, leaving you no other line of defense...

Posted by Frank Glover at November 6, 2005 05:30 PM

You definately need WPA, MAC limitting in not sufficient. There is probably a way to bypass the passphrase and enter the hex code directly. I had a problem on older equipment where the hex code generated for a given password differed between systems.

Posted by David Summers at November 6, 2005 07:28 PM

Another thing to look into, I ran into it last year. If using a robust code, or strong password, make sure that your router and your card are both set to the same encryption...128bit...64bit...whatever. Those things are supposed to check and validate, but sometimes they choke of the encryption strength.

Mac

Posted by Mac at November 7, 2005 06:44 AM

When you say it lops off the characters to 8 digits are you counting the astericks or can you still see the actual code that you typed in? Cause its not uncommon for a client application when you enter a secure code it will truncate the information entered into the field and turn it to astericks. The true value of the field is still set its just the information is masked not only in detail but in length as well.

I would make sure your router firmware is of the latest version. I know they have been sniffing lots of bugs out of WPA and if you just bought the wireless adapter you might be on a different revision supported by the wireless adapter then the one currently being implemented in the router.

That and I've found that buying the same brand router and wireless adapter is the best bet in terms of capability.

Posted by Josh Reiter at November 7, 2005 07:33 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: