Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Hyperdrive Hype (Part II) | Main | And Speaking Of Moonbats »

Another Moonbat Heard From

The list of comments on the space passenger NPRM continues to grow:

first of all, there should be NO commercial space flights since the pollution from commercial space flights negatively impacts every single u.s. citizen. one flight alone can kill thousands of people. i think this should be solely a govt. endeavor.

secondly, it is clear that the most rigorous standard must be used for any person who is permitted to do this by our govt. it is clear this should not just be a jaunt in the sky for a celebrity or rich man, as seems to be going on these days.

the pollution from these flights is substantial. it is time to put a damper on the endless pollution being allowed by those who profit from it, with no regard for those negatively impacted by the pollution from it (their health, their breathing dirty air, etc.

what does the rest of the american public gain from these kinds of extravaganzas? nothing.

Broken shift key. Broken brain.

If you want to read the rest (there are some serious comments up now, from XCOR, Rocketplane and Orbital Commerce), click here, and type in Docket Number 23449. Some of them are very large (multi-megabyte) PDFs. Interestingly, there's nothing up there yet from Scaled Composites, Virgin Galactic or The Spaceship Company. Is Burt just holding his fire? Or still looking for a regulatory end around?

Posted by Rand Simberg at January 07, 2006 05:52 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/4815

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

I'll let others comment on "the pollution from these flights is substantial" remark...the observation she made earlier in the post...is the one that got me.

"one flight alone can kill thousands of people. i think this should be solely a govt. endeavor."

Thinking back on it, she may have a point...killing thousands of people SHOULD be solely a govt. endeavor.

At least her heart is in the right place, even if her facts are not.

Mark

Posted by Mark at January 7, 2006 07:52 AM

(sigh) With those mentalities in charge, would we have ever had aircraft, ships (except maybe sailing ships...maybe)or been free to use electricity (or even fire) in any form without a license...?

But I suppose Luddites have to grab on to something, when it's no longer a matter of their tax money being spent.

Posted by Frank Glover at January 7, 2006 11:51 AM

She's right! They kill too many!

We need to build Orion Ships that are only estimates to kill ten or so people worldwide per launch.

Posted by Mike Puckett at January 7, 2006 12:55 PM

> killing thousands of people SHOULD be solely a govt. endeavor.

Iraqis should be doing that.

Posted by Bob Hawkins at January 7, 2006 03:49 PM

Most companies and professional folks wait until the last second to file their comments, so that further comments can't rebut them. I know this is what my office does when it files comments with the FCC.

My guess is that the good guys hired good lawyers to write their comments, and they'll be in just before the comment period is over.

B

Posted by Brian at January 7, 2006 08:17 PM

David Deutsch: "A passenger on an EVA operation can easily decide to throw something at earth that might pose public risk."

Gotta hand it to commenters like this -- they make reading EIS's and other otherwise-dry public policy documents entertaining.

Posted by T.L. James at January 7, 2006 08:30 PM

OTOH, this is the safe way to launch plutonium to space since, hey, thousands of people are going to die anyway.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at January 8, 2006 07:20 AM

David Deutsch: "A passenger on an EVA operation can easily decide to throw something at earth that might pose public risk."

Wow. I'll bet a penny dropped from way up there would really hurt if it landed on your head.

[/dolt]

Posted by McGehee at January 8, 2006 11:23 AM

So...when we lost Columbia, instead of being concerned about where massive, temprature-resistant objects like the SSMEs might end up, the real threat was the crews' pocket change...?

That wasn't the 'many worlds' physicist David Deutsch, was it? I gave him more credit. If only 'simply demonstrate a cold o-ring' Feynmann were still here...

Posted by Frank Glover at January 8, 2006 12:11 PM

All is lost, and has been, since the first Earth Day in the 70s. Perhaps some new Curtis LeMay type person in our armed forces can round the greenies up and put their body mass to good use.

Posted by at January 8, 2006 05:39 PM

You know, the comment Rand quoted demonstrates a mindset so lacking on logic as to be staggering. If I seriously believed "one flight alone can kill thousands of people" I'd want to stop ALL spaceflight. Yet she seems to think such dangerous activity is okay as long as government does it!

Such mindless trust in government would be funny if it were not so scary. Fortunately, it is fairly rare nowdays, even among Lefty moonbats. Well, maybe not -- the government most of them blindly trust is UN.

Posted by Ilya at January 9, 2006 02:45 PM

McGehee --

I read David Deutsch's comment, and I think it is poorly phrased but entirely reasonable. He suggests "fines and penalties for leaving uncontrolled satellites near earth's orbit". I agree. Space junk is a very real problem.

Posted by Ilya at January 9, 2006 06:47 PM

Bob Hawkins wrote:

"My guess is that the good guys hired good lawyers to write their comments, and they'll be in just before the comment period is over."

No, just Jeff and me. We usually post our comments on the last possible day, just because we're so busy and have so many other things competing for our time.

Brian wrote:

'David Deutsch: "A passenger on an EVA operation can easily decide to throw something at earth that might pose public risk."'

This did prompt me to go through the NPRM to make sure it didn't prohibit spacediving.

Brian also wrote:

"Gotta hand it to commenters like this -- they make reading EIS's and other otherwise-dry public policy documents entertaining."

I read, "I spit on your proposal," and told Jeff I would never again accept an accusation that I am undiplomatic. I love those guys; they make me look like the voice of sweet reason even when I'm telling FAA how badly they messed up.

(On this one, they messed up only slightly, and probably accidentally. They didn't just listen to us; they _heard_ us. Anyone who has worked either in or with government knows how rare that is.)

-R

Posted by Randall Clague at January 10, 2006 06:28 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: