Media Casualties Mount
Administration Split On Europe Invasion
Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire
Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan
Pot, Kettle On Line Two...
Allies Seize Paris
Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics
Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit
Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff
A New Beginning
My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds)
James Lileks Bleats
Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman)
Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson)
Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle)
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Space Flight
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Nanobot (Howard Lovy)
Lagniappe (Derek Lowe)
Geek Press (Paul Hsieh)
Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge)
Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin)
Cowlix (Wes Cowley)
Quark Soup (Dave Appell)
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck)
Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al)
Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil)
Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling)
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum
Day By Day
Happy Fun Pundit
Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon)
Scrapple Face (Scott Ott)
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs)
England's Sword (Iain Murray)
Daily Pundit (Bill Quick)
Daimnation! (Damian Penny)
Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli)
The Kolkata Libertarian
Midwest Conservative Journal
Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al)
Dean's World (Dean Esmay)
Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee)
Spleenville (Andrea Harris)
Random Jottings (John Weidner)
On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman)
Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen)
Inadvertent Comic Relief
Warblogger Watcher (Cowardly Anonymous Idiotarians)
Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse)
A libertarian reads the papers
Anna Franco Review
Ben Kepple's Daily Rant
Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher)
End the War on Freedom
Insolvent Republic of Blogistan
James Reuben Haney
Mind over what matters
Page Fault Interrupt
Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief)
The Blogs of War
The Fly Bottle
The Illuminated Donkey
What she really thinks
Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet
Zem : blog
Space Policy Links
The Space Review
The Space Show
Space Frontier Foundation
Space Policy Digest BBS
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste)
Unremitting Verse (Will Warren)
World View (Brink Lindsay)
The Last Page
More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer)
Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd)
Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons)
The New Space Age (Rob Wilson)
Rocketman (Mark Oakley)
Site designed by
Is The Party Over?
Arecibo can't find any ice on the moon.
I think we should be planning asteroid/comet missions, anyway. The private sector is more likely to do that, since they'll be more focused on the practical use of resources than science and symbolism.Posted by Rand Simberg at October 22, 2006 10:48 AM
Rand, water is 1/9th hydrogen and 8/9ths oxygen by mass.
No lunar water ice? A disappointment but not a show stopper. Oxygen is everywhere on the moon.Posted by Bill White at October 22, 2006 11:45 AM
I didn't say it was a show stopper. But I still think we need to be looking at NEOs.Posted by Rand Simberg at October 22, 2006 11:57 AM
I agree. Capitalizing on asteroidal commodities seems like a much more attractive option to me.Posted by Josh Reiter at October 22, 2006 07:18 PM
Josh, can you amplify this?
I agree. Capitalizing on asteroidal commodities seems like a much more attractive option to me.
If Dennis Wingo is wrong and there are no platinum bearing asteroid fragments on the luanr surface, then I will grant the point. If there are, processing those in 1/6th gravity will be far easier than in zero-gee out at some NEO.
As for volatiles, if someone can harvest O2 on the moon and ship H2 from Earth, it seems to me that water made by burning Terran H2 with lunar LOX will be far cheaper to acquire than NEO H2O.
At least at first.
That said, I fully support going to the NEOs.Posted by Bill White at October 22, 2006 07:58 PM
Sure, terran H2 water will be a lot cheaper on the moon, but how does it compare to NEO water once it's transferred to L1?
This might be just me, but I can't imagine that people would want to live on a rock with a huge gravity well and no atmosphere any more than they'd want to live on a Cambodian minefield.Posted by Chris Mann at October 22, 2006 09:28 PM
The way I read the various aricles that refer to the Nature article, it seems that the high circular polarization ratios that were once assumed to be indicative of Hydrogen (and thus, water ice) also appear in high resolution radar images of areas that could not have water ice on the surface. This implies either that the water ice is mixed in with the regolith (as asserted by Mark Whittington) or that the high CPR does not indicate water ice after all (as I asserted in a comment on Bad Astronomy when Phil Plait brought this up a few days back). At any rate, the angle of incidence of radio waves from Arecibo is (at best) pretty much the same as the angle of incidence of light from the sun, so that radar could never look into the bottom of a crater at the lunar South pole anyhow. These Cornell researchers have set up and knocked down a strawman.Posted by Ed Minchau at October 22, 2006 11:10 PM
When the analysis was done on how much it would cost to build an O'neill habitat, the cost and payback period per person was so high that the construction of such habitats was considered unfeasible by profit-seeking private groups.
This has lead Freeman Dyson (who is now the president of the Space Studies Institute) to promote and do research aimed at the settlement of asteriods by "small" groups of individuals.
There are the NEOs, the main belt, and in the more distant future the Kuiper belt. If human settlement is to be focused on large bodies, we're pretty much limited to Luna and Mars.
I thought it was always understood since the 1970's that the "small bodies" (asteriods, comets, KBOs) was where the action would be.Posted by Kurt at October 22, 2006 11:46 PM
If we should be prospecting for asteroid ice, might I suggest Deimos? The payoff would be much easier transportation to and from Mars.Posted by Brad at October 23, 2006 01:42 AM
Deimos? Absolutely, IMHO. The delta V from Deimos to EML-1 is actually quite low, relatively speaking and that station can serve multiple purposes including helping to open Mars as well as ship volatiles to cis-lunar space.
= = =
As for EML-1 water supplies, you can ship LOX from Luna to EML-1 and H2 (or other better stored fuel) from Earth to EML-1. Shipping H2 to Luna so you could ship the water to elsewhere would be silly.
An added benefit of shipping fuel and LOX separately is that if the fuel and O2 would arrive already divided no energy input is needed to crack them apart. Then, if combusted to make water for long term storage (through a fuel cell, for example?) the station benefits both from the water and electricity generated by the fuel cell.Posted by Bill White at October 23, 2006 05:08 AM
Evidence for hydrogen has not been knocked down, though ?
It still can, as soon as NASA stops raping the science budget to duplicate the capabilities of commercial boosters.Posted by Chris Mann at October 25, 2006 12:14 PM
Post a comment