Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« History Repeats? | Main | The End Of Free Republic? »

More On The X-Rocket Tragedy

It looks as though there may have been a mid-air collision, but we'll have to await the accident investigation to know for sure.

The question in my mind is, why there were five people in a camera chase plane? Yeah, it's probably a fun ride, and I'd like to have gone along myself, but I suspect that they'll rethink who are and are not essential personnel on such flights in the future.

Posted by Rand Simberg at October 27, 2006 06:51 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/6389

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

My guess is that it's a bunch of people who like to fly and think a MiG is cool. A hobby more than a business.

Are there FAA regs against formation flying?

Posted by Rodney Naylor at October 27, 2006 07:21 AM

As the Cheyenne ascended after takeoff, an air traffic controller radioed the pilot to warn him about vapor seen coming from the right engine, Gregor said. The pilot radioed back saying he didn't think it was a problem.

...

"The plane was completely burned up," said John Ginn, fire district chief for Chino Valley north of Prescott. "The only thing left was a small section of tail and two engines. There was very little discernible."

Yet another example of sloppy reporting in the mainstream media. Piper Cherokees are single engined planes. If the plane was a twin-engined Piper, then most likely it could've been an Apache, Aztec, Seneca, or Navaho. If it resembled a Cherokee, then it was most likely a Seneca.

If there was no sign of damage on the MiG-21, then it seems unlikely that the planes collided.

If it was a Piper Cherokee, then finding two engines at the crash site would be a good indication of a collision since the Cherokee only has one engine.

Posted by Larry J at October 27, 2006 10:12 AM

I guess I'm missing something. What's the relationship between the crash (tragic though it is) and the X-Rocket? I scrolled down through your previous posts, down to the 19th, and couldn't find any other references to the crash. Was there someone on the plane that crashed who was associated with the XR?

Sorry if I'm being dense. I'm just not clear on the relationship between the title and the story, is all.

Posted by nukemhill at October 27, 2006 10:26 AM

A piper Cheyenne is not a Piper Cherokee.
A Cheyenne is a twin engine presurized turboprop.

As far as formation flying, its allowed as long as both pilots agree before the flight.

Regs: far 91.111.b No person may operate an aircraft in formation flight except by arrangement with the pilot in command of each aircraft in the formation.

Also
91.111.c No person may operate an aircraft carrying passengers for hire in formation flight.

Posted by Paul Breed at October 27, 2006 10:36 AM

Damn, it looks like I misread the article. Sorry about that.

Posted by Larry J at October 27, 2006 11:39 AM

"Damn, it looks like I misread the article. Sorry about that."

Apologise to the mainstream media.

Posted by Rodney Naylor at October 27, 2006 12:02 PM


This article is inaccurate. The control tower tape is archived on liveatc.net. The pilot reports losing sight of the Piper and smoke on the ground, but at no point does the he say there may have been a collision.

Posted by at October 27, 2006 12:46 PM

From what I read, a mid-air collision was a guess but not much evidence to support that. Formation flying is certainly allowed, but how close do you have to be to verify whether the landing gear is stored or not? I would think 200 feet, especially with other observers onboard, is close enough.

Posted by Leland at October 27, 2006 10:50 PM

wow 5 people dead, this is a tragedy al around.

Criminal investigations have to get opened,

lawyers show up like flies to sugar,

bad feelings exist everywhere,

people lose nerve, insurance rates rise,

This could be 10 years of litigation, I wonder
if it will end up like the "Bonfire of the vanities"

Posted by anonymous at October 28, 2006 09:03 AM

the NTSB report inmplies wake turbulence
tore the tail off in flight

Posted by anonymous at October 29, 2006 02:23 PM

"the NTSB report inmplies wake turbulence tore the tail off in flight"

That was my suspicion too. Several things to consider:

-tail was found half a mile from wreckage, implying that it came off in flight.

-plane flew under jet, then disappeared. If there's no evidence of a collision, then one assumes some kind of wake turbulence and structural failure.

-small, lightweight plane formation-flying with a bigger jet. Probably not the kind of thing you should do unless specifically trained for it. The private plane is not stressed for the same kind of flight as the MiG. Two MiGs doing formation flying are safer than this because they're both built tough.

Posted by Rodney Naylor at October 29, 2006 04:49 PM

Well, if it was wake turbulence, in some sense it was a collision, if only indirectly...

Posted by Rand Simberg at October 29, 2006 05:09 PM

I had read on some other blog (can't remember which one now) that this was Ed Wright's company... is this so?

My heart goes out to the friends and families of the people who died.

Posted by Ed Minchau at October 29, 2006 11:13 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: