Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Remember The Hood | Main | Flexibility »

Engaging The Public

An interesting interview with George Whitesides, Executive Director of the National Space Society. I would point out, though, that NASA had nothing to do with GPS.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 29, 2007 06:41 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/7617

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

I re-read the article to be sure I was clear on the intent of his statement: George was saying that NASA was *not* responsible for GPS. He cited GPS and comsats as examples of how the launch industry grew beyond just NASA and has been very successful.

Posted by Tim at May 29, 2007 10:45 AM

Read the very next sentence. He is saying that "NASA served as the catalytic role and then got out of the way." It did that for comsats, but not GPS, which is a DoD program.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 29, 2007 02:53 PM

The sentence structure may not have been clear, but my point in the interview was simply that the government efforts in space that have had lasting value (whether DoD, NASA, NSF or other agencies) have been those that have created infrastructure usable for others. That includes a small list of examples including GPS and Comsats.

Posted by George at May 29, 2007 11:50 PM

Clarification noted, George. I know that sometimes in a verbal interview, things can come out differently than intended. I just wanted to make sure that the readers understood that NASA didn't do GPS. There are enough spinoff myths out there as it is without adding a new one.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 30, 2007 08:03 AM

The biggest internal obstacle is NASA's achievement-oriented culture, which sees its mission as a series of discrete challenges to accomplish rather than as cultivation of general human expansion. If you asked them to make wine, they would spend millions studying its chemical composition, building extraordinarily complex and delicate equipment to synthesize poor-tasting facsimiles, and go through several generations of such machinery before something vaguely resembling wine in appearance, taste, smell, and alcohol content was produced. Then, they would put their hundred-million-dollar glass of wine in a case in the Smithsonian, dismantle all their equipment, leave the fragments to rust as a monument at Marshall, and then start entirely from scratch on their mission to make beer.

IMHO, they need more biologists, economists, MBAs, and systems people involved in top-level planning, because since it's inception NASA has been guided primarily by engineers, astronauts, and penny-wise/pound-foolish accountants.

Posted by Brian Swiderski at May 31, 2007 07:38 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: