Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« More Comments Hygiene | Main | Fuel of the Future »

Is There an Eco in Here?

I landed at the Ft. Lauderdale airport yesterday and there was a sign that said that to decrease water use, the airport has changed its thermostat from 74 to 78. Call me hopelessly brown, but it seems to me that they can attract more money to pay for more water via tourism if their airport is comfortable rather than politically correct. Water can be recycled, pulled out of the ocean and the air. The economic value of the savings is summarized by the market price for more water which is still measured in hundreds of dollars per acre foot. An acre foot is enough water to cover an acre one foot deep, or 325,851, gallons putting the price of water in gallons per cent. Skimping on use is pain for no gain. Or is masochism the main point of being Green?

Posted by Sam Dinkin at June 08, 2007 02:09 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/7656

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

The point of being Green is subservience to elites.

Being Green means everyone being equal -- just that some are more equal than others.

OTOH, being a good environmental steward requires rational analysis, acceptance of tradeoffs, critique of previous decisions, and a readiness to change with changing facts.

Any Greens want to joust?

Posted by MG at June 8, 2007 02:18 PM

Unless the facility is being penalized with a takings tax.

Still, this is likely a feel good measure.

The shame about water usage is we are required by law to treat all water to USEPA drinking water standards even the water that goes on the lawn. That is the real waste, the cost of treatment.

It is a shame the we are limited to a singular distribution system defined by the potable requirement even when non-potable uses account for the overwhelming majority of consumption.

Of couse part of the takings issue we don't want to artifically push streams into what is called a 7Q10 situation during a drought. It is to protect the donor waterbody as much as anything.

If cheap desalinization were perfected, that would solve many issues.

Posted by Mike Puckett at June 8, 2007 02:20 PM

Isn't nanotube-based desalinization already in the works? At the current rate of price drop, that should be economical in a few years...

Posted by Big D at June 8, 2007 03:10 PM

Or is masochism the main point of being Green?

Is a four degree temperature diff that noticeable?

Posted by Brian at June 8, 2007 03:13 PM

Is a four degree temperature diff that noticeable?

Depends how close the temperatures are to the dewpoint. And in Florida...

Posted by McGehee at June 8, 2007 06:55 PM

"It is a shame the we are limited to a singular distribution system defined by the potable requirement even when non-potable uses account for the overwhelming majority of consumption."

Private well water is good for lawn irrigation.

Posted by John Kavanagh at June 8, 2007 09:58 PM

I'm confused. How does raising the AC temperature help reduce water usage? Energy, sure, but water use?

Posted by Doc at June 9, 2007 12:25 AM

Is a four degree temperature diff that noticeable?

Yes. Especially since it's really an 8 degree difference from the norm.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at June 9, 2007 01:40 AM

I'm confused. How does raising the AC temperature help reduce water usage? Energy, sure, but water use?

If it were in the west, I'd say they were using swamp coolers. But maybe they are using something similar where the part that radiates heat into the environment being well above the dew point even for Florida and hence can be cooled by evaporating water.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at June 9, 2007 01:44 AM

In Florida, at least, you have to keep the inside temperature at 74 degrees or below to retard mold growth.

Posted by Andrea Harris at June 9, 2007 04:57 AM

Most large commercial/industrial Air Conditioning units
use water flow to boost cooling. The Condenser unit
sits outside, as a high temperature radiator,
if you blow air over it, you are limited in the rate at
which it can dump heat to the environment.
If you flow water, particularly in a series of louvers so it evaporates
the latent heat of vaporization gives a tremendous cooling
advantage.

It makes the units smaller, quieter, and more effective.

Now if the Ft Lauderdale airport wanted to be more
conscientious, perhaps they could design A/C towers
that ran on sea water.

Posted by anonymous at June 9, 2007 09:33 AM

"Or is masochism the main point of being Green?"

Actually, I think there are 2 main points: (1) sadism on the part of the Greenies (notice how the real sacrifices are supposed to be made by the proles, not the "elite" Greenies; and (2) it's another mechanism to make the Greenies feel good about themselves.

Pfui.

Posted by Barbara Skolaut at June 10, 2007 07:19 AM

Is a 4 degree difference that noticeable?

I noticed as soon as I walked off the plane and was sensitive to the hard to read sign explaining it. I strongly recommend no one who likes 74 go to Fort Lauderdale airport any more. The object is to make things pleasant for tourists--not barely non-uncomfortable.

Posted by Sam Dinkin at June 10, 2007 08:45 AM

Another possibility here is that the "conserving water" claim is being used as an excuse for malfunctioning or underpowered equipment. This would work similarly to the way failure in national security can reinforce those who caused the failure. Ie, the airport is at 78 degrees F. The airport can state that it's that warm because the air conditioning doesn't work well and the air port isn't going to fix it any time soon, or it can claim that the temperature is that high because some great environmental good is being served.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at June 11, 2007 04:30 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: