Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Stifling Of Dissent At AT&T? | Main | Is The Media Protecting Harry Reid? »

Does Mars Need Humans?

That's the title of today's Dust-Up at the LA Times, between me and Homer Hickam, as we continue our Sputnik week debate.

[Late evening update]

Tomorrow's Dust-Up, on whether NASA has been helping or hindering private enterprise in space, is up today. Transterrestrial, your personal time machine!

Posted by Rand Simberg at October 02, 2007 01:01 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/8292

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

"Forget Mars, _Mojave_ needs women!"

Posted by Doug Jones at October 2, 2007 05:24 PM

It seems to me that Homer is a bit of an ole' softy and romantic when it comes to NASA and space. He doesn't have much in the way of tangible ideas to some of the grander schemes he mentioned. Perhaps he is just making as efficient use of his writing space to piece his opinions together. Rand's paragraphs are like shotgun blasts of talking points all crammed together. Although, if I had been a read of this site for so long then I might have gotten lost on a few things mentioned on Rand's side. Two very different writing styles that is for sure.

Posted by Josh Reiter at October 2, 2007 07:34 PM

"Forget Mars, _Mojave_ needs women!"

In order to adrress dis problem the bored is meating to discuss offering you a discount s3x changs.

Posted by dOC at October 3, 2007 02:59 AM

It seems that the two of you are in broad agreement on what the agency should be doing. Not on whether it can or should.

Posted by john hare at October 3, 2007 03:02 AM

Josh: So it's basically two pundits talking past each other? quelle surprise.

I will say, as a long-time reader of this site, that I pretty much can predict Rand's position before I even read the column. NASA's an outmoded outdated pointless waste of taxpayer dollars, they couldn't pour piss out of a boot with directions printed on the heel, private development is the only possible solution, hoo-haw doot-dee-doo.

Posted by DensityDuck at October 3, 2007 08:31 AM

"NASA's an outmoded outdated pointless waste of taxpayer dollars"

Not really. Current NASA human saceflight program is, however. And unfortunately it consumes lions share of resources that it has, rendering the rest of the agency relatively irrelevant.

No matter how you spin it, spending billions after billions after billions for several decades, to get a really marginal number of government employees to space with no clear purpose whatsoever, is just not responsible behaviour.

Screw the money spent, US is a rich country ( still ). However, wasting engineering talent and losing and actively obstructing opportunities for real development is just inexcuseable.

Posted by kert at October 3, 2007 12:04 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: