 |
|
 |
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by 
Powered by Movable Type |
 |
|
"We All Tell The Same Stories" John Hawkins has an interview with one of the Slick Grope Vets For Truth, Kathleen Willey, who has a new book out I finally was emotionally able to look at my husband's autopsy report while writing the book and there were some things in there that got my attention. I'm not an expert and I don't pretend to be, but I did take the autopsy report and show it to an expert, a criminology and forensic expert, and she saw some pretty compelling inconsistencies in that report and she suggested that I pursue it, that I get further opinions, which I am doing. I feel like I owe that to his memory, I owe that to my children, and for my own piece of mind. I want to know what happened. That's what I talked about briefly in my book. It had always been a given at the time that Ed Willey had committed suicide--I don't recall anyone questioning it. But there's ample reason to always question when associates of the Clintons supposedly "commit suicide" or meet some other untimely end. They seem to have a lot more such associates than most people. Posted by Rand Simberg at November 14, 2007 08:17 AMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/8496 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
I think the simplest explanation is that the Clintons surround themselves with people as flaky as they are. Posted by FC at November 14, 2007 08:23 AMThere are a lot of words that come to my mind when I think of the Clintons and their associates, but "flaky" is not one of them. Posted by Rand Simberg at November 14, 2007 08:32 AMAnd here I thought that manuscript was lost/stolen by those nefarious Klintons! I mean, didn't we just have this discussion a few weeks ago, and now, lo and behold, it's now a book!
And here I thought that manuscript was lost/stolen by those nefarious Klintons! I mean, didn't we just have this discussion a few weeks ago, and now, lo and behold, it's now a book! If you actually follow the link, and read, instead of making moronic comments, you'll discover that the manuscript was in fact taken. She never claimed that it was her only copy (she almost certainly had it on her computer). The purpose was probably to get advance notice of what was in the book to prepare their counterattack on her, not to deprive her of it. Posted by Rand Simberg at November 14, 2007 09:27 AMYes, thanks, I did both. And I figured that was exactly what your reply would be. Thanks for the usual courteous discourse. Interesting how much noise was made about the alleged "theft," and how much little noise is being made by the antagonists in this affair (those Klintons), vis a vis the material in the book. If you already know the facts of the matter (from having allegedly "done the deeds"), why would you need to know what she wrote to prepare a counterattack? Logic dictates that if she's telling the truth, it's a truth the Clinton's already know.
Thanks for the usual courteous discourse. You come in here with your childish snark, and expect "courteous discourse"? Amazing. Interesting how much noise was made about the alleged "theft," and how much little noise is being made by the antagonists in this affair (those Klintons), vis a vis the material in the book. Perhaps after reading the manuscript, they decided to just ignore it, and try not to give it any additional publicity? If you already know the facts of the matter (from having allegedly "done the deeds"), why would you need to know what she wrote to prepare a counterattack? They know what they know. They don't necessarily know what she knows. And just to get this straight, based on your scare quotes above, are you insinuating that Ms. Willey is lying? Do you have any basis for such an insinuation, or are you just engaging in the standard Clinton-defender tactic of slandering their accusers? Which ironically, is the very subject of the book. Maybe you'll feature in her next one. Posted by Rand Simberg at November 14, 2007 09:46 AMWilley's book is amazing! Consider this excerpt: Lanasa, one of the two men to whom my husband owed money, would have been happy if I'd ended up in the street pushing a grocery cart. I tried to reason with him. Since I had signed that note for Ed, I offered to settle with Lanasa for half of the amount Ed had stolen. I felt it was the right thing to do. But that wasn't good enough. He wanted all of it and then some. So we couldn't settle. Luckily for me, I had a really smart, bright lawyer, Dan Gecker.After her husband embezzled 275 grand from a client, Willey offered to split the difference. She is clearly a woman of compromise. But no, Lanasa demanded all of it. The meanie. Didn't he realize how much it costs to send the children to college? It was around that time that Willey approached Bill Clinton, in her greatest hour of need... And, Jim Harris, your point is...? Posted by Rand Simberg at November 14, 2007 10:14 AMThe first link appears to be to an article about "Academia's Pervasive PC Rot" and Delaware Students. Unless I'm missing something, it's unlikely that someone actually read the interview before posting. Posted by Tom at November 14, 2007 11:10 AMThanks, Tom, I fixed the link. And though Andy doesn't have any evidence that Kathleen Willey is a liar, we now have some evidence (proof in fact) that he is. High-larious. Posted by Rand Simberg at November 14, 2007 11:17 AM> Nope, never saw the first link. Mea culpa. And I wondered what the hell link you were talking about that had any relevant information. Amazon surely didn't. > Or perhaps there was just nothing there? > She can't know of something they didn't do. And since they're pretty smart people, I imagine they have a defense ready for any of their previous actions. Which means there isn't much, other than conjecture, that she might offer. > Those are your words, not mine. Just calling it like it is. She could be lying, she could be telling the truth, but until it's proven, I'll, unlike you, treat it as just an allegation. > Since I never made such an insinuation here, I'm not guilty of libeling anyone. Nope, never saw the first link. Mea culpa. Wow, you are brazen. I wrote: "If you actually follow the link, and read, instead of making moronic comments, you'll discover that the manuscript was in fact taken." To which you responded: "Yes, thanks, I did both." It's right there, above. So were you lying then, or are you lying now? Posted by at November 14, 2007 11:43 AMas pointed out, I went to the link to the post (Slick Grope) and to the link to Amazon. I never saw the first. Nothing brazen about it, simply a mistaken reference. Posted by Andy at November 14, 2007 12:21 PM"I think the simplest explanation is that the Clintons surround themselves with people as flaky as they are." Vince Foster was probably the steadiest person in the whole White House for the first six months of 1993. I've seen the Clinton "Death List" at least a dozen times. I've also seen rebuttal to it saying something to the effect of, "...well in any given group there are a certain number of deaths going to occur" I would agree with that to a certain extent. But it's never anyone who they knew casually who dies with a weird autopsy or bad police report, it's somebody super close to them. It was always somebody like Wiley, Vince Foster or Ron Brown, that's about to roll over or be forced to testify. Seemingly the number one cause of death in Arkansas or at the DNC in the 1990's, was knowing or working closely with the Clintons. Andy, Glad I could help. Interesting to read the fallout. Posted by Tom at November 15, 2007 05:54 AMPost a comment |
|
. And who would have thought that there could be a potential new Clinton scandal from the nineties (of course, much of the public remains unaware of the old ones--something that the Slick Grope Vets may rectify if Hillary gets the nomination):