Transterrestrial Musings




Defend Free Speech!


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay




Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type 4.0
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« A Stalking Horse For McCain? | Main | Identity Politics »

A Potential Breakthrough?

A new class of high-temperature superconductors:

According to Steven Kivelson, a theoretical physicist at Stanford, "[there exist] enough similarities that it's a good working hypothesis that they're parts of the same thing." However, not everyone hopes the mechanism is the same. Philip Anderson, a Nobel Laureate and theoretical physicist at Princeton, says that an entirely new mechanism of superconductivity would be far more important than if they mimicked the current understanding of superconductivity. "If it's really a new mechanism, God knows where it will go," says Anderson.

Let's hope.

 
 

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: A Potential Breakthrough?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.transterrestrial.com/admin/mt-tb.cgi/9401

4 Comments

Paul F. Dietz wrote:

These are materials composed of five elements. There are tens of millions of subsets containing five elements (and many more variations in the ratios of the elements). We've barely scratched the surface in finding and characterizing possible phases. The previous unexpected high Tc material was a simple binary compound (magnesium diboride, Tc = 40 K).

I wonder if the first material was found by automated screening. This sort of combinatorial chemistry is well suited to high throughput robotic experimentation.

Big D wrote:

Just how close are nanotubes to superconducting? ISTR that lengthwise, they were supposed to be incredible conductors, and across the grain, excellent resistors.

Jeff Mauldin wrote:

Way cool. Years ago I was fascinated with the hypothetical room-temperature superconductors in Niven's "Ringworld." That, and the ridiculously sharp wire that was only a molecule or two thick.

Another fascinating property of superconductors, if I remember correctly, is that they also are temperature superconductors--they have the same temperature everywhere. Is that true, or it is it true of all superconductors?


Paul F. Dietz wrote:

Another fascinating property of superconductors, if I remember correctly, is that they also are temperature superconductors--they have the same temperature everywhere. Is that true, or it is it true of all superconductors?

It's not true at all. In fact, it's one of those scientific mistakes Niven's stories have propagated.

In reality, the thermal conductivity of a superconductive material decreases as it is cooled below the transition temperature. The paired electrons are in a condensed state with very low entropy, and as such cannot carry heat.

One of the applications of high Tc superconductors is as current carrying leads to connect low Tc superconductors to a hotter outside environment. The high Tc lead leaks much less heat than (say) copper or aluminum would.

Leave a comment

Note: The comment system is functional, but timing out when returning a response page. If you have submitted a comment, DON'T RESUBMIT IT IF/WHEN IT HANGS UP AND GIVES YOU A "500" PAGE. Simply click your browser "Back" button to the post page, and then refresh to see your comment.
 

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Rand Simberg published on April 23, 2008 9:04 AM.

A Stalking Horse For McCain? was the previous entry in this blog.

Identity Politics is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.1