Transterrestrial Musings




Defend Free Speech!


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay




Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type 4.0
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« The State Of Fusion Research | Main | Weirdest Republican Endorsement Yet »

Rapid Propellant Transfer

John Hare discusses a concept for dumping propellant from a launcher to a LEO depot in a single orbit.

As I note in comments there, I don't see any need for such a requirement. Once you're in orbit, there's not really that big a rush to come back. The depot has to be in a high enough orbit that it doesn't decay rapidly, so the only cost of staying longer is crew consumables (if there is a crew). Power would presumably come from the depot itself while mated.

But it's not only an unnecessary requirement, it's an impossible one, other than in equatorial orbits (unless you want to wait a very long time for opportunities). Any orbit with significant inclination has a narrow launch window (at least from a given launch site--an air-launched system would have more flexibility). The likelihood that, when you get into the right orbit plane, the station will be waiting for you precisely where it needs to be to rendezvous in a single orbit it exceedingly small. That's why it takes a couple days for Soyuz or Shuttle to rendezvous with ISS. They launch into the right orbit plane, but they have to spend several orbits catching up with it. And the faster they do it, the more propellant it costs.

As I note parenthetically above, though, you can get there directly if you have an air-launched system with significant range for the aircraft (e.g., Quickreach).

 
 

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Rapid Propellant Transfer.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.transterrestrial.com/admin/mt-tb.cgi/10528

3 Comments

Dave Salt wrote:

Rand said: "The likelihood that, when you get into the right orbit plane, the station will be waiting for you precisely where it needs to be to rendezvous in a single orbit it exceedingly small. That's why it takes a couple days for Soyuz or Shuttle to rendezvous with ISS."

Up until ASTP, *all* US RVD was achieved within at most 3 orbits, which shows the importance of being able to launch on-time in a reliable manner.

The fact that the ISS scenario takes several days has more to do with the likelihood of launch holds/delays than basic orbital mechanics.


Dave

john hare wrote:

Rand,

Are you quite certain no bureaucrat would spec something so unreasonable to protect another pork district? It could be quite useful to have some way in mind to beat the system if you have to.

john hare wrote:

Rand,

Are you quite sure no bureaucrat would write a spec like that at a little prodding from his corporate connections?

Leave a comment

Note: The comment system is functional, but timing out when returning a response page. If you have submitted a comment, DON'T RESUBMIT IT IF/WHEN IT HANGS UP AND GIVES YOU A "500" PAGE. Simply click your browser "Back" button to the post page, and then refresh to see your comment.
 

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Rand Simberg published on October 21, 2008 8:40 AM.

The State Of Fusion Research was the previous entry in this blog.

Weirdest Republican Endorsement Yet is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.1