Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Don't Forget The Lunar Eclipse | Main | Don't Accept The Double Standard »

Unintended Consequences

Affirmative action is keeping blacks out of the legal profession. Get out the crayolas and color me shocked. As the article points out, good intentions aren't enough, and when they implement racist policies, they're all the more egregious.

[Late evening update]

Jeff Goldstein has further thoughts.

Posted by Rand Simberg at August 27, 2007 06:07 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/8106

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

It's always these 'them' folks isn't it.

Posted by Adrasteia at August 27, 2007 08:31 PM

By all means, critique the following, or offer your own analysis.

My take on the AA ideologues:

1. There are observable statistical differences in behavior (and inferred traits) amongst various ethnicities.

2. The US political system recognizes equivalent political status of people, regardless of these differences (and their practical consequences).

3. The ideologues want to be seen as "good".

4. The ideologues can't (or won't) simultaneously recognize the differences, but ignore them for purposes of political status. That is, they can't (or won't) treat as political equals those groups that they don't recognize as social, economic, or intellectual equals.

5. This tension between fact (of differences) and faith (the differences don't matter for political rights) creates guilt in the ideologue. How can they be "good" if they believe others are inferior, and don't act consistently (i.e. hypocritically) with that belief?

6. To alleviate their guilt, they join the cult of affirmative action. AA becomes a religious practice. They participate in its rituals and its creeds. They defend its dogma against its deniers. And the practical consequences of AA are irrelevant. The religious aspects, and the psychological effects, are what matters.

Here is what I don't understand:

Why not join the cult of America? The principle creeds include:

All Men are created equal.
All Men have inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (implicitly, in that order).

and so on. It seems acceptable to join a civic religion that simultaneously recognizes that all people have different attributes, but the same political rights. Why sign on to a different religion?

Thanks for any sincere thoughts.

If you have only scolding to offer, donate it to someone you can influence with it.

Posted by MG at August 28, 2007 01:22 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: