Securities pay $1 if candidate nominated for respective party. Go to Intrade to trade these. The images are deep linked so should reflect the most recent trades whenever you load the page.

McCain:

Giuliani:

Huckabee:

Thompson:

Obama:

Clinton:

Rand: I'd like to caution people they are betting on a long shot if they follow your advice to give to Thompson.

You should also post Mitt's chart here.

Please explain more clearly that these are essentially national "bets", not NH "bets".

Long shot, high payoff, Sam. And it's not about the money.

Romney:
Here.

I must admit I don't see much point in political giving or activism. It's rare that one person can sway an election. But if one does see a high payoff in swinging an election, isn't it about 8 or 10 sigma more likely if candidates are neck and neck than if one has ten times the prospects of the other? Illuminate me. How is the civic duty to vote more useful than a civic duty to answer customer service surveys?

There isn't a known and legally binding outcome from answering a customer service survey, and there is for voting.

Looks like Clinton got her mojo back with New Hampshire returns.