They invariably take the side of anyone NON-white over anyone white regardless of the issue in my experience. It’s part of their self loathing make up of internal nuttiness.
Hmmm? I wonder if they have a psychologically based nut allergy too.
I do wonder about the actual demographics of the crowd. All are likely not anti-semites, yet they do tolerate them in their midst unlike the tea party which actively eliminates bigots.
Again, crickets from the media… it’s not part of their agenda [to destroy America which seems really odd since they are Americans aren’t they?]
Ken, when they refer to the 1%, who do you think they’re talking about?
The arguments they’re making – the bankers have all the money – are exactly the same arguments made by the Third Reich.
Rush Limbaugh reports a David Brooks column implicating Adbusters – a magazine with a long-standing anti-Semitic background, as a driving for ce behind OWS.
I’d say they have an anti-caucasian attitude too.
They invariably take the side of anyone NON-white over anyone white regardless of the issue in my experience. It’s part of their self loathing make up of internal nuttiness.
Hmmm? I wonder if they have a psychologically based nut allergy too.
I do wonder about the actual demographics of the crowd. All are likely not anti-semites, yet they do tolerate them in their midst unlike the tea party which actively eliminates bigots.
Again, crickets from the media… it’s not part of their agenda [to destroy America which seems really odd since they are Americans aren’t they?]
Ken, when they refer to the 1%, who do you think they’re talking about?
The arguments they’re making – the bankers have all the money – are exactly the same arguments made by the Third Reich.
Rush Limbaugh reports a David Brooks column implicating Adbusters – a magazine with a long-standing anti-Semitic background, as a driving for ce behind OWS.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/10/11/the_wall_street_protests_are_full_of_ignorance_hypocrisy_anti_semitism