2 thoughts on “Tea Parties”

  1. The modern version has a lot more in common with the original than the left wants to think.

    How would they know? Most of them don’t know real history, they know the new, re-vised, “they were all rich, white, rapists” history. And that’s why they get it all wrong.

    What concerns me is that the Prog’s don’t think the current down trodden, misrepresented people can or will revolt. And I don’t see that being a good outcome. I fear that the new “Strange Fruit” will be liberals.

  2. I’ve been reading a biography of Samuel Adams, and it keeps hitting me how “everything old is new again.” The Old Tories hated him because he was declasse and a purveyor of what today’s New Tories would call “hate.” (“Hate” being Hivespeak for criticizing the Ruling Class.) I’m non-religious, so it surprised me that ol’ Sam was not a Deist but a true believing Christian, whose opposition to tyranny was derived from his Christianity. (I’m pretty sure he wasn’t the originator of “Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God” but he certainly would have endorsed it.) He was kind of combination of Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh–with beer!

Comments are closed.