7 thoughts on “Hillary’s Watergate?”

  1. There’s a very simple reason that the NYT would be out front with this story: “Elizabeth” (aka ‘the fake (Amer)Indian’) Warren.

    Why go with Clinton sleaze plus semi-socialism when you can have the pure socialist product?

    1. You may be on to something. Glenn Beck, in his novel of the same name, calls it “The Overton Window.” You threaten the populace with something horrendous, and then substitute something seemingly less horrendous, and the populace reacts with, “Phew! This isn’t as bad as we feared!”

      In the case of Hildabeast vs. Fauxcahontas, it’s difficult to decide, however, which is the more horrendous.

  2. I don’t think this is going to help Hillary much. But really, what difference does it make?

    http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/05/18/2012-dia-docs-weapons-moved-libya-syria-benghazi-attack-planned-memorial-911

    Catherine Herridge reported this morning on “America’s Newsroom” that a Defense Intelligence Agency memo from Sept. 16, 2012, concluded that the Benghazi terror attack was planned at least 10 days in advance to coincide with 9/11 and was in retaliation for a drone strike that killed an al Qaeda strategist. The memo was copied to the National Security Council, the State Department and the CIA.

    “The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for the [U.S.] killing of Aboyahiye (Alaliby) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings,” the memo said.

    But Jim said none of this was true and has implied that Fitton is a nut. Ergo, I must conclude that I am wrong.

Comments are closed.