11 thoughts on “Kamala Harris”

  1. If the Russians and/or Chinese launched a surprise counter force attack on the US – targeting missile silos, bomber bases and sub bases only – would “Dr.” Jill Biden – who’s apparently running the Joe bot or Kamala really pull the trigger to retaliate? Especially while it was in progress before the assets were lost? More to the point, would our enemies believe that they wouldn’t?

    1. The Russians and Chinese have been testing our leadership’s resolve and judging by our lack of responses, they know they can get away with whatever they want.

      What is holding China back from taking Taiwan? They likely don’t feel quite ready, their military buildup and modernization isn’t complete. Also, they still fear our military but that might not be for much longer as Gen Milley and other Democrats imbedded in the military install Marxist ideology in the forces.

      The last point is why they wouldn’t attack us directly. We still field the finest military in human history and even if it is turned into a conscription based Marxist training academy, the people in control wouldn’t like being attacked.

      1. “The last point is why they wouldn’t attack us directly.”

        They wouldn’t for the same reason the Japanese wouldn’t attempt an invasion of the United States. We have an armed citizenry, and no one knows who is armed – just that a sh$%load[1] are.

        Horribly, we have to note that the U.S. federal government has the same concern over an armed citizenry that the Japanese did and that the Chinese do. Attempts by the current administration and Congress to curtail the 2nd Amendment are both national security threats, and domestic security threats.

        The federal government isn’t sovereign in the United States. The individual is the sovereign, and delegates certain powers to the government, as defined in the Constitution. We, the people, had better start recognizing these facts.

        [1] Shitload

        1. I don’t disagree, especially if more civilians had force on force training. At the same time, China would have zero inhibitions when it comes to use of force.

  2. What is holding China back from taking Taiwan? They likely don’t feel quite ready, their military buildup and modernization isn’t complete

    China’s economy is very much linked to Taiwan’s. Particularly with regards to chip manufacturing. Unless carefully managed a military invasion of Taiwan would potentially put a lot of the important infrastructure out of commission that China cannot afford to lose at this time. However, the day that China either figures out a way to preserve the infrastructure or determines it doesn’t need it anymore Taiwan is toast. Unless, of course, the West somehow regrows a spine.

    1. They (China) published a timeline for when they expect to be able to accomplish certain things. We aren’t at the date where they expect to be able to take over Taiwan but the date isn’t far off, whether or not they are ready by that date is another thing.

  3. Harris has no future unless Biden dies or drops out of office. Then she’s got a bit of future.

  4. It’s time to make sure that not only Kamala Harris has no future, but the ‘Democratic’ Party as well.

    1. You’da thought that a party that, because it lost an election, tried to start its own country and ended up starting a war, would have had no future, too.

      Yet the Democratics of the 1860s seemed to have survived that episode quite well. I expect the current ones to be around no matter what they try to do these next few years.

Comments are closed.