I don’t know how any thinking person could fail to question the election results.
Mass society wide censorship, violent riots to intimidate people and shut down their events, installing partisans in state and local government election agencies, having partisans wearing BLM and Biden clothing count votes, kicking out observers, and all the other election shenanigans shows that it wasn’t a free and fair election.
As I point out, Trump even won the non-free and non-fair election based on him almost sweeping the bellwether counties. Those counties were subjected to the same media bias, censorship, and outright lies as the rest of the country, yet Trump still won them easily. So the Democrats had to shut down the vote counting and ship in pallets of fake ballots to completely rig the election.
The last paragraph of the Martyrmade thread put it pretty succinctly, “they” here refering to Trump voters –
“They were led down some rabbit holes, but they are absolutely right that their gov’t is monopolized by a Regime that believes they are beneath representation, and will observe no limits to keep them getting it.”
While there was plenty of reason to distrust the election, what has happened since then to advance that point of view? I’m pretty ignorant, but I’m asking. I have heard that some of the states have done real investigations. Is that true, and what have the results been? Have there been any real audits, and if so did they find significant numbers of wrong votes?
There’s only so long I’m winning to hang on to pre-investigation complaints.
Sorry, that’s *willing*
“The Constitution expressly cedes authority for conducting elections to state legislatures. But in Pennsylvania, election laws were changed by the Executive Branch and then upheld by the Judiciary, over the objections of the Legislature.”
Article 2 I believe grants said authority to the state legislature. Noteworthy but not surprisingly the news media’s coverage to the states passing laws to correct the abuses are labeled by the mainstream media as “voter suppression”. No effort is made to even discuss that the states legislatures are constitutionally (& exclusively) empowerd to make said changes. Or of course to mention the likely un-constitutionality of the “For the People Act”. The Federal government that is the party-in-power getting to write the rules for all fifty states for the next election(s). No reasonable possibility (if not certainty) of abuse there…
I don’t know how any thinking person could fail to question the election results.
Mass society wide censorship, violent riots to intimidate people and shut down their events, installing partisans in state and local government election agencies, having partisans wearing BLM and Biden clothing count votes, kicking out observers, and all the other election shenanigans shows that it wasn’t a free and fair election.
As I point out, Trump even won the non-free and non-fair election based on him almost sweeping the bellwether counties. Those counties were subjected to the same media bias, censorship, and outright lies as the rest of the country, yet Trump still won them easily. So the Democrats had to shut down the vote counting and ship in pallets of fake ballots to completely rig the election.
The last paragraph of the Martyrmade thread put it pretty succinctly, “they” here refering to Trump voters –
“They were led down some rabbit holes, but they are absolutely right that their gov’t is monopolized by a Regime that believes they are beneath representation, and will observe no limits to keep them getting it.”
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1413165168956088321.html
While there was plenty of reason to distrust the election, what has happened since then to advance that point of view? I’m pretty ignorant, but I’m asking. I have heard that some of the states have done real investigations. Is that true, and what have the results been? Have there been any real audits, and if so did they find significant numbers of wrong votes?
There’s only so long I’m winning to hang on to pre-investigation complaints.
Sorry, that’s *willing*
“The Constitution expressly cedes authority for conducting elections to state legislatures. But in Pennsylvania, election laws were changed by the Executive Branch and then upheld by the Judiciary, over the objections of the Legislature.”
Article 2 I believe grants said authority to the state legislature. Noteworthy but not surprisingly the news media’s coverage to the states passing laws to correct the abuses are labeled by the mainstream media as “voter suppression”. No effort is made to even discuss that the states legislatures are constitutionally (& exclusively) empowerd to make said changes. Or of course to mention the likely un-constitutionality of the “For the People Act”. The Federal government that is the party-in-power getting to write the rules for all fifty states for the next election(s). No reasonable possibility (if not certainty) of abuse there…