Stand Up For Your Rights

I just don’t get all this hate on uncovered boobage and Alan Simpson. If rights to seeing and saying tits aren’t constitutionally protected, what are? The very word is enshrined and embedded right there in the middle of “consTITution.”

In fact, I think that this invention, while not the worst one in the world, is right up there, and clearly unconstitutional (audio may not be safe for work).

[Via Burge on Facebook]

8 thoughts on “Stand Up For Your Rights”

  1. I would call this garment The American Burkha, and should be banned (and burned) wherever it is found. Next thing you know they’ll invent nipple warmers so that women won’t have “unsightly” headlights events.

    It’s time to take back America for promiscuity, sexual objectification, and gratuitous titillation. If you want to wear that cleavage covering crap you can go to Saudi Arabia.

  2. I saw that commercial first time this week. STUPID. Here’s my question, if a guy usually goes commando, and his fly is down in public, is the answer to that, a SOCK, or should he just ZIP UP?

    Yeah it’s a stretch.

    I’m guessing this product solves a common problem.. Grown women buying low cut, breast exposing blouses, and THEN finding out their boobs are a focal point for us? I’m claiming that hardwired thing. And if she’s got a nice butt too, VERY hardwired.

    (I wonder if plumbers / construction guys would buy a similar masculine product for covering butt crack cleavage? Make it in denim, carhartt canvas, or mossy green camo)

    This whole things reminds me of an old joke.

    “Women should always be placed on a pedestal.”

    (that way we can see up their skirts!)

  3. Audio MAY not be safe for work is perhaps a bit of an understatement. It’s okay to go for the full NSFW tag without the qualification on that one, Rand.

    That said, it was funny as all hell. I will be passing that one along to friends.

  4. Unfortunately, at my very prudish client, your site will be off limits for the next few days because of that photo. Thanks to our very stringent net nanny, any display of attractive females is prohibited. Co workers with daughters over 10 or attractive girlfriends/wives have found that when they try to put up a family photo the net nanny blocks it, and sends a report to their manager. PC gone amok.

  5. Well, my ethnic heritage is from what is now an Islamic country in the European Near East, and I actually prefer this “layered look” whether you call it an American burkha or not. Leaves more to the imagination too, and I would not be an engineer if I didn’t have good mental skills for 3D visualization.

    I went to this kickoff meeting for a local “Hacker Space”, and there was this young woman there (these sorts of meetings used to by “guy space”) who was doing her part to avoid the “layered look.”

    You know, this is the next interation of this feminist gobbledygook. “I am going to show my body in any way I please, and if you as much as sneak a glance, you, sir are an animal.” It is a chick-conspiracy to exercise greater levels of social control and shaming over the dude-world.

    Yeah, yeah, I am an animal and a fetishist too that I attach certain meaning to what are simply geometric shapes, colors, and textures. But this is a form of social fascism over me as a dude, that I am supposed to have certain visual “features” in my environment and I am supposed to not stare and say, “So, what do you think of that new line of Atmel PICs?”

Comments are closed.