The New York Times (shockingly!) gets it wrong. (Again)
[Update a while later]
And then there’s this misleading hed. You have to get deep into the story to find out that this decision was made during the Obama administration, and had nothing to do with Haley. Unless the headline is “Ambassador Haley’s Quarters Have $52,000 Curtains Ordered By The Obama Administration,” what is even the point of this story? Other than, of course, to make the Trump administration look bad.
With regard to the latter story:
"The article should not have focused on Ms. Haley, nor should a picture of her have been used. The article and headline have now been edited to reflect those concerns, and the picture has been removed." https://t.co/WTKrwMFYkN
— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) September 14, 2018
IOW, there was no point to the story. I wonder if the Public Editor will have anything to say about this?