It is completely impossible to enforce a ban on AI development, and forcing it underground with no oversight is almost guaranteed to have pathological side effects.
After, drug prohibition works perfectly and doesn’t induce other crimes at all, does it?
It’s becoming very clear that the AI incumbents want two things from the government. The first is immunity from civil liability. The second is to make sure that there are no further entrants. No garage startups.
It is completely impossible to enforce a ban on AI development, and forcing it underground with no oversight is almost guaranteed to have pathological side effects.
After, drug prohibition works perfectly and doesn’t induce other crimes at all, does it?
Like the jerk offs doing clandestine gain of function research on viruses. That worked out well.
Don’t you think it is a little self serving of the author to make that claim?
A book about the need for AI, written by Grok?
Did I wake up in an episode of Dark Mirror or an issue of the Babylon Bee?
What’s the difference?
It’s becoming very clear that the AI incumbents want two things from the government. The first is immunity from civil liability. The second is to make sure that there are no further entrants. No garage startups.
You nailed it.