Category Archives: Media Criticism

Media Criticism, Political Commentary

How Bad Are Obama’s Numbers?

1 Comment

This bad:

Romney is the only candidate leading Obama among registered voters, 48 percent to 46 percent, with 6 percent undecided, according to the new Gallup poll. Perry and Obama are tied at 47 percent among registered voters, also with 6 percent undecided.

Obama would beat Paul, 47 percent to 45 percent, and best Bachmann by a 4-point margin, 48 percent to 44 percent.

“Registered” voters always tend to skew more Democrat than likely and actual voters. When Obama’s only up two points on Ron Paul among them, you know he’s in trouble. Of course, bad news for the president is good news for the country.

[Update a couple minutes later]

I’m not a big fan of Rick Perry, but Professor Bainbridge has found a reason to vote for him — the trial lawyers hate him.

Media Criticism, Political Commentary, Social Commentary

Inequality Grows

28 Comments

…as poor ignorant atheists swamp the nation:

As far as I can see, this is bad news for everybody. Atheists and agnostics like to think of themselves as smarter than the God-bothering trailer trash on Tobacco Road, and deeply dislike the thought that they are losing the argument among the most intellectually qualified and best prepared; religious people have to be concerned for the future of religion when whole social classes are dropping away.

It is also very bad news for the poor. The rich can actually get along without much religion; one of the nice things about being rich is that money can frequently shield you from the consequences of a weak character and bad decisions. If you are rich enough, you can do very poorly in high school but Daddy will have a nice chat with the college president after which the school gets a new gym and you get a slot in the freshman class. You can be pretty sure that the college won’t flunk you out or expel you without a lot of second chances and counseling.

Oh, and if somehow you booze and flirt your way through college and don’t pick up any useful skills, don’t worry. You won’t have any student loans to repay and Daddy will make sure that you find something to do.

The poor aren’t so lucky. The poor kid who wants to get ahead actually has to achieve something. He or she has to sacrifice, defer gratification, learn useful skills, and endure the scorn of classmates who think he or she is a geek and a nerd. Some of us are able to do all that and more without the strength and focus that comes from faith in God — but most of us need all the help we can get.

I’ve been able to manage without, but I’ve noticed that a lot of people can’t. And it seems that the public schools have finally done Dewey’s job.

Media Criticism, Political Commentary

Me, Too

9 Comments

Conservatives want to see Paul Ryan enter the race:

Ryan is the perfect 0bama foil. He is patient and kind while Obama is brittle and testy. He is utterly genuine while Obama is phony. Ryan is the boy next door, the guy you can count on. People respond warmly to him. Paul Ryan is low-key and likable while the current WH occupant is high-strung, high-maintenance and extremely arrogant. Ryan has great intellectual credentials and has always been an authentic conservative thinker. His relative youth would contrast nicely with our hapless president’s tired, old act. I think Ryan could get out there and impress voters as a modern version of Abraham Lincoln, and, God knows, we really need a person like that, somebody who is authentic, somebody who is the real deal.

While any of the current Republican candidates would be a vast improvement over the current occupant of the White House, Ryan is the only one for which I would have any enthusiasm. Fairly or not (mostly not, as a result of the continuous media attacks on her for the past three years), Palin has too many negatives with too many people to be electable (at least this cycle), and Christie has problems in my mind on Second-Amendment issues and an unwillingness to recognize the threat of Jihadism.

There are only two down sides to Ryan. It would make it harder to campaign against Obama on his previous lack of executive experience, and the president would attempt to argue that he’s now had some (I can imagine the campaign slogan: “Obama in 2012: Partway Up The Learning Curve!”). The other is that, while he’s not irreplaceable, it would be good to seem him continue as Chairman of the Budget Committee, particularly with a Republican Senate.

[Mid-morning update]

Oh, be still my heart. George Pataki is considering getting into the race. I guess he wants to compete with Huntsman for the “Democrat in Republican clothing” Republican vote. All two percent of it.

[Early afternoon update]

Too bad. Ryan’s not running. He would have been the closest serious candidate to my own views in, perhaps, my lifetime, or at least since Goldwater.

[Update a while later]

Five reasons Ryan isn’t running.

Media Criticism, Political Commentary

Will The President Run Again?

3 Comments

Ed Morrissey wonders. I don’t think that the LBJ comparison is quite apt. While LBJ did think a lot of himself, he was also in pretty bad health, and likely knew that another term would kill him (he barely lasted that time period without being president). I think that Obama is far too self delusional to not run again.

On the other hand, Michael Malone has some interesting advice for the president, that he won’t take.

[Update late afternoon]

Wrong link in the second one. It’s fixed now.

Education, Media Criticism, Philosophy, Political Commentary

The Lies Of Rousseau’s Disciples

7 Comments

…have been laid bare in England:

The Left-liberal camp is in overdrive in its campaign to rewrite history (or, in its own vocabulary, to alter consciousness): you did not see thousands of jubilant thugs rampaging through the streets, destroying livelihoods and property for the sheer exultant joy of it. What you saw were society’s victims responding to any or all of the following: bankers’ bonuses, MPs cheating on their expenses, unemployment, government spending cuts, poverty, social inequality, etc, etc. Their crimes were simply part of the same package of callous selfishness displayed by (as one particularly bizarre equation had it) tabloid phone hackers.

What is not ludicrous and insulting to common sense in these propositions is contradictory in its own terms. There are indeed views of the human condition which hold that all species of wickedness are connected, because they are all rooted in the fact that man is a fallen creature. But somehow I doubt that the ardent liberal secularists who were piping up last week were believers in original sin or the machinations of the Devil.

The moral equivalence that they wanted to establish between looters and arsonists on the one hand, and the perpetrators of any other kind of bad behaviour you can think of on the other, was rooted in ideological, not theological, orthodoxy. The rioting gangs could not simply be what they seemed – what they so obviously were – because that would be a devastating victory for the judgment of popular opinion over the fantasies of liberalism.

There’s actually nothing “liberal” about it.