Frank Zegler of ULA explains. He has a follow up as well.
The whole thread is worth a read if you want to understand the potential of this technology for reusable orbital systems.
Jeff Foust isn’t very impressed with an expensive new book.
…are technically and financially feasible.
But not the way NASA and Congress want to do it.
This is refreshing. A scientist who thinks it may be there now, and has no problems with terraforming. Usually such people are concerned about the ethics.
Chris Bergin has a pretty detailed account. The focus still seems to be on a slow response in the throttle valve.
He seems to be ignoring Aaron Mehta’s interview with Gwynne last week, though, in which she said the next attempt would probably be on land.
The view from the barge.
Looks to me like it may have suffered damage to legs from hard twisted landing, and the thruster could only hold it up for so long.
[Update a few minutes later]
Aviation Week has the details from the announcement at the Space Symposium earlier this week.
Gywnne says that the next landing attempt may be on land.
It’s been five years. Stephen Smith has some reflections.
The stupidest thing he said was that we shouldn’t go back to the moon because “Buzz has been there already.”
[Noon update]
More thoughts from Laura Seward Forczyk.