Did their diet prevent dental caries?
US Temperature History
Has NASA/NOAA been fiddling with it to match expectations rather than reality?
Congressional Hobbling Of Spaceflight
Michael Lopez-Alegria weighs in at the Huffpo:
Flying our astronauts should be a national strategic priority, and NASA should be free to continue expanding its use of public-private partnerships and building on its successes. NASA will always lead our nation’s exploration of space, but it must empower all the members of the team that makes that happen, including commercial companies. If Congress can ensure that NASA is cutting bureaucracy and getting the most value for its money, our nation will have a bright future of space exploration ahead of it. If not, our human spaceflight program may be a disappointment for years to come.
Instead, “safety is the highest priority.”
I may have missed it, but I’ve seen no support in the media for the Shelby shenanigans.
The IRS
…didn’t follow the law after it “lost” Lerner’s emails.
Laws are for the serfs, not the enforcers:
Here’s the bottom line. The IRS has been accused of targeting the political opponents of the Obama administration. The response, in rough order of emission, has been:
- No they didn’t. It was all (quoth the president of the United States) a “phony scandal.”
- They targeted liberal groups too (except the IRS inspector general disagrees).
- It was all the fault of two “rogue agents” in Cincinnati (that was Jay Carney’s little piece of drollery)
- Then we had Barack Obama’s personal assurance that there was not even a “smidgeon of corruption” at the IRS. “Smidgeon, noun. Informal: a small amount of something.” There wasn’t even a small amount of corruption at the IRS—which is why, of course, a senior agency employee like Lois Lerner decided to take the Fith Amendment to avoid self-incrimination.
Mr. Koskinen’s testimony over the last several days has been greeted with what might politely be called skepticism, not to to say naked disbelief and contempt, by Congress. “You promised to produce documents,” Darrell Issa reminded Mr. Koskinen. “You did not. . . .
You worked to cover up the fact they were missing and only came forward to fess up on a Friday afternoon after you had been caught red-handed.”
Some might say that John Koskinen was guilty of obstruction of justice. Currently, the Wikipedia entry for “Obstruction of Justice” lists four “notable examples” of the crime. Leading the list is Richard Nixon’s efforts to silence people involved in the Watergate scandal. I wonder whether there will soon be a fifth notable example. If so, it is likely to include the names of John Koskinen, Lois Lerner, and who knows how many people at the White House.
Not if the media has anything to say about it.
[Update a few minutes later]
Speaking of the media, now Woodward and Bernstein are wondering where they are?
Apparently, being a Democrat operative with a byline trumps the chance for a Pulitzer.
[Mid-afternoon update]
Mark Levin goes ballistic after last night’s hearing:
Levin also pointed out that Democrats wouldn’t be obstructing so hard if it weren’t for White House involvement, which tells him that this IRS targeting scandal goes all the way to the top.
That would be the way to bet, yes.
The Presbyterian Church On Israel
World War I
Ten myths about it.
Pledge Today
[Early afternoon update]
In case you don’t understand the importance of this charity, you need to read about the struggles of Hillary.

Physicists And Philosophy
Hey, guys, please stop saying dumb things about it.
“Piketty’s Big Book Of Marxiness”
A review, including a review of the reviews.
The EPA Overreach
No, you can’t just rewrite the law to justify your junk science, EPA.
This is a good victory, but it doesn’t completely undo the damage from the court’s previous decision, which was also based on junk science.