Strange Bedfellows

Tea Party In Space praises Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein.

Hey, it’s the best thing they’ve ever done for the space program (a low bar for them, or California Democrats in general), though they’re certainly doing it at the behest of Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne in Canoga Park and Aerojet in Sacramento, not because they care about space. I hope this throws a mighty wrench in the Senate Launch System works.

Five Theories

of Weinergate. I’m going with Occam’s Razor, myself. Particularly considering what a weaselly vaginal rinse the guy is.

Andrew Klavan says that the Weiners of the world are womens’ fault.

[Update]

Weiner comes clean. But he says he won’t pull out. Or…errrrr…something.

Well, why should he? Ted Kennedy killed a young woman, and served for decades more. All you have to do is be a Democrat.

[Update a while later]

So why isn’t the media hounding Huma for a comment? You know they would if he were a Republican.

It Couldn’t Possibly Be Because She Knows History

See, when Sarah Palin gets something right that her critics get wrong, it’s just because she’s lucky:

Patrick Leehey of the Paul Revere House said Revere was probably bluffing his British captors, but reluctantly conceded that it could be construed as Revere warning the British.

“I suppose you could say that,” Leehey said. “But I don’t know if that’s really what Mrs. Palin was referring to.”

McConville said he also is not convinced that Palin’s remarks reflect scholarship.

“I would call her lucky in her comments,” McConville said.

Well, I think I have to go with the professor here:

But Cornell law professor William Jacobson, who asserted last week that Palin was correct, linking to Revere quotes on his conservative blog Legalinsurrection.com, said Palin’s critics are the ones in need of a history lesson. “It seems to be a historical fact that this happened,” he said. “A lot of the criticism is unfair and made by people who are themselves ignorant of history.”

OK, but at least they understand business, and economics, and world affairs. Right? I mean, they are our moral and intellectual superiors. We can be sure of this because they tell us so.

[Update a few minutes later]

Now who looks stupid? They never realize how stupid they look. It’s part of the problem of stupidity. Anyway they’re being stupid doesn’t fit the narrative.

Thank You, Democrats

For picking Debbie Wasserman Schultz to head the DNC:

…she…seems an odd choice to lead the national party. She is not terribly well-known, is not considered an expert on the less-than-gentle art of politics, and, as she has shown in recent days, is somewhat gaffe prone.

Plus she talks as though she has a mouth full of marbles. This may cost Obama Florida (i.e., the election). Not that he has great chances there to begin with.

Biting Commentary about Infinity…and Beyond!