An interview with Judith Curry.
Punitive Damages
For those wondering about Mark’s and my “awards by the jury.” It seems certain that his won’t stand.
Sifting The FBI’s Garbage
Kimberly Strassel does the dirty job for us.
I have zero trust in either the FBI or the intelligence community. They are enemies of the Republic.
“An Extraordinary, Unusual Circumstance”
Don’t worry, New Yorkers, we won’t come after you.
Free Speech
…is truly under assault.
My lawsuit was just a small part of it.
America’s Dysfunctional Upper Class
How did these awful people come to be running our lives?
NASA’s Space Solar Power Plan
NASA has lacked ambition since the late seventies.
Civilizational Suicide
How “progressive” policies are designed for it.
Stanford
“Passion Is Not Misconduct”
No, but what Professor Mann did is. An illogical, misinformed editorial at Science.
[Update a while later]
A few more thoughts on the case from Will Bates.
[Friday-morning update]
The latest over at Mark Steyn’s place: “So the net result of Mann vs Simberg is that Mann owes Simberg $8,587.64. Pay up, you deadbeat.”
Well, he actually owes it to both me and CEI, and we have to split it, so he only owes me a little over four times the (soon to be likely reduced) judgment. Here is our latest filing.
[Late-morning update]
The battle between skeptics and climate “dictators“: “Skepticism is a necessary aspect of the scientific discovery process. During the trial, however, skeptics such as Curry were not allowed to testify, despite her having prepared a 54-page report for the court on the hockey stick science, which was highly critical of Mann’s work.”
Judy did testify, but only as a fact witness, not an expert witness.
[Early-afternoon update]