Some thoughts from Mark Steyn:
It was, in a certain sense (and putting Russia and Japan to one side), a “western civil war” between the Anglophone democracies and Continental Fascists – but for some reason that’s far less congenial an interpretation to EU myth-makers.
Indeed.
The Dems had better be careful where they cast that next stone.
“…it would look just like the dog that Obama ate.”
This is the gift that keeps on giving.
Bryan Preston is unduly pessimistic. The answer is yes, and hopefully in a couple weeks.
How long will the Brits allow this kind of policy insanity to continue?
“Obama ate a dog” edition. This is like a permanent employment act for people like Jim Treacher and Frank J. And of course, the inevitable Dogs Against Obama web site.
[Late morning update]
Just when did the presidents stop eating dogs? Treacher’s having way too much fun with this.
[Update a few minutes later]
Why Barack Obama identifies with the dog eaters. The rest of us are just bitter, clinging to our provincial American cuisine.
I have some thoughts about the belated mourning of the Shuttle program, over at PJMedia.
It’s what’s for dinner.
I think it’s another campaign backfire by the Obamaites. They’re probably regretting picking on Romney about Seamus about now.
It’s sort of turning into a telephone game, like this piece:
Simberg, an aerospace engineer, says a new law granting the United States conditional permission to claim extraterrestrial land is internationally legal. His view: failure of the 1979 Moon Treaty to get even one signature nullifies the Outer Space Treaty.
a) The Moon Treaty has fourteen countries who have acceded to it.
b) I didn’t say that the Moon Treaty’s failure nullifies the OST.
Other than that, they get it completely right.