History, Law, Media Criticism, Political Commentary

The Classified Appendix To The Durham Report

14 Comments

Margot Cleveland has gone through it, so you don’t have to:

[Update a couple minutes later]

[Update a while later]

14 thoughts on “The Classified Appendix To The Durham Report”

    2. Will they find Hillary’s suicide note taped to the back of that portrait of Bill in Blue?

      Maybe if you hold the portrait up to UV light?

  2. Maybe if you drag a $1 bill through a trailer park you can find a patsy to take the fall?

    I’m sorry, this is just too much fun…

  3. Anyone else finding it interesting that the NYT is giving this story a good leaving alone?

  4. Well former representative Matt Gaetz thanks a change of venue might occur if significant actions communications by the particulars occurred outside of Washington DC beltway. This might frighten some of the particulars like Hillary Clinton depending on how much evidence they actually have against her and to accepting some sort of immunity and exchange for flipping on others like Barack Obama but we’ll see

  6. This continued BS with the Ghislaine Maxwell situation is also a distraction. Normally if someone who is either facing charges or in her case convicted/incarcerated says they have information about other crimes/criminals typically they would be offered immunity from prosecution for said information. That is in exchange for said info about other crimes/criminals she knows about and may have participated in that implicate others higher up she is granted immunity for her testimony indicating her participation in said crimes. That would be par for the course nothing unusual about that. It not like they are saying a pardon for her crimes already convicted of just reasonably you wouldn’t expect someone to spontaneously confess to their involvement in a host of other crimes that they could be prosecuted for. They would merely plead the 5th. Yet their screaming like this is the greatest injustice in the history of the world granting her immunity for her testimony.

      1. Why do we have to take the word of a convicted felon when we can get the testimony from the victims themselves? They are all adults now. Whatever happened to #MeToo and #BelieveHer? If it’s a question of statute of limitation, who cares? When just getting the testimony rather than a conviction is the goal? This whole thing reeks. Everyone is dirty to some degree and the bottom line is that it is a pox on all houses. If the victims are unwilling to testify then you just have to drop it. Sucks, but sometimes fairness sucks.

        I think it’s indicative that Trump was angry at Epstein for poaching his female employees from Mar-A-Largo, not for what their fate was afterwards. Now in fairness, maybe Trump didn’t know what Epstein was up to. Personally I think that’s a stretch but that’s just my opinion.

        1. “Why do we have to take the word of a convicted felon when we can get the testimony from the victims themselves?”

          Yes. But it isn’t mutually exclusive; the testimony of the victims would be able to corroborate any testimony from Maxwell. As far as the statute of limitation goes as far as the perpetrators, bring them in under oath and make them plead the 5th. Love to see Bill Clinton pleading the 5th.

      2. You want another crazy angle?

        #JusticeForJeffery!!!

        Now maybe you think that has happened already…

  7. The most crazy thing about this whole Durham Report Classified Annex business is that the FBI fell in lock step with exactly what the intercepted Russian intelligence analysis said they would do! Even though that manufactured narrative tried to point the finger directly at the Russians!

    That plus the idea (later fact) that the MSM would also fall into lock step with the FBI!

    As Walter Kirn points out, it’s the Russian who understand the workings of our own Deep State and MSM far better than we do…

Comments are closed.