I don’t understand why this wouldn’t be in NASA’s charter. You can say they haven’t been doing a very good job of it, but the response to that should be to fix that, not create another agency.
5 thoughts on “Another Space Bureaucracy”
Comments are closed.
Totally predictable. This is what DC does. Doubleplusgood if some pol can get it named after them.
All of the co-sponsors of this idiocy have NASA centers and/or legacy space industry in their states. My own guess is it’s an effort to provide some of NASA’s higher-ranking recent RIFs with another federal teat to suckle.
Don’t usually vote in primaries, will be voting against Cornyn.
Good. I always vote in primaries. My vote typically counts two to five times more in a primary than it does in a general election. And primaries are often more consequential than general elections.
Change the name to “National Institute for Space Settlement” and the direction of research to the be descriptive of the new title and that might be an idea?