Why Greenland is important.
Greenland – As viewed from a proper map
— Object Zero (@Object_Zero_) January 6, 2026
Why Greenland? Well because Moscow bases almost all of their strategic military assets on the Kola Peninsula next to Finland. This is where the Russian ICBM silos, submarine bases, and their strategic bombers are.
If you look at the… pic.twitter.com/z6qECCJ3u5
I’m pretty sure that Copenhagen is not capable of defending it.
[Update a while later]
I can't believe this needs to be explained but:
— Robert Anderson (@ProfRobAnderson) January 6, 2026
1. The US is not going to attack Denmark.
2. The bluster from Trump is to give encouragement to Greenlanders for a vote of independence, and a warning to Denmark not to ignore the results of such a vote.
3. Once the vote for…
One very important site in Greenland is Thule which housed some of the original BMEWS systems and now houses one of the PAVE PAWS/ UEWR phased array radars which is critical to missile launch detection as it’s field of view is pointed right at the Russian missile fields and the paths over the North pole. Fyligndales in the UK also sees some of the same field, but is far closer to Russia and more vulnerable to an early attack. Thule is needed for our defense, Denmark is likely already toast in any scenario where we need UEWR.
The problem is not that it needs to be explained, but rather that it needs to be explained by Trump not a rando on the internet. Then the explanation would be based on Trump.
And that last bit is a ludicrous explanation from the point of view of Greenlanders. They will throw off the yoke of their Danish oppressors only to embrace the yoke of US oppressors? What’s in it for them to go through the effort?
I think it would be better to negotiate in good faith with both Denmark and Greenland. Then everyone can get what they want.
Although Murmansk Oblast hosts a great deal of military value, the Strategic Rocket Force is scattered across Russia. So, no, most of the trajectories do not cross Greenland.
Swing that magenta limits arc across most any part of Russia you’d like to, and tell me that what you said is true.
Plot a great a circle route from Krasnoyarsk (ICBM silo field nearby) to Los Angeles (route is 9600 k) and tell me which part of it passes over Greenland. It doesn’t. You’re allowed to move both ends of the arc. I’m surprised you don’t know how this stuff works. The map is crude propaganda and its underlying fact (that Russian ICBMs are all on the Kola Penn,) is wrong.
Irkutsk missile base to Washington DC comes close (over Baffin Island) but narrowly misses Greenland. Most trajectories pass over Canada. I hear we can buy it from the First Nations.
I didn’t say all of them. I said most.
Don’t try and move the goalposts. But for most westward fired ICBMs it does
The map says “Russian Federation”
It took me several readings before it stopped saying “Soviet Union”.
They will always be “The Soviets” to me.
Not “the Rooskis?”
Where the Hell is Major Kong?!
We should just offer to relocate Greenlanders to Minnesota and help them set up day-care centers. (Have the Somalis there show them how it’s done.) The weather there will be similar to what they are used to, and I’m sure they can adapt to eating lutefisk instead of whale blubber. No beaches, but then they aren’t much into surfing in Greenland, or so I’m told.
None of this Greenland business makes any sense to me.
We already have a Space Force base located in Thule. It was an Air Force base before that and had been for decades.
If we want advanced missile defense systems in Greenland, under Danish sovereignty, we can just negotiate an agreement to put them in. Just like we did with Thule. H*ll in fact, at one point, in 1960 we even installed a nuclear reactor there (Camp Century) for a few years.
As far as defense is concerned, Denmark is a member of NATO. An attack by Russians against Greenland is an attack against NATO. Simple.
The fact we’re discussing a nonsensical propaganda map suggests where the problem may lie. Greenland? Might be more useful to take French Guiana.
The Danes have been quite reticent to allow defenses there of late
My take on the Greenland business is that from Trump’s point of view you never negotiate from your floor that is the least of what you want you always start higher. Start negotiation with the idea Greenland purchased from Denmark becoming a Territory of the United States possibly a state and then negotiate down to what he really expects. Which is a vote in Greenland heavily juiced by the United States promises of largess for Greenland’s citizenry to get the Geenlanders to agree to independence. Subsequently there would be a treaty between the United States an independent Greenland a treaty would simply give them autonomy as far as their local government etc for the United States we would have exclusive assets as far as military bases and/or mineral rights.
So while the Democrats are busily crafting some war powers resolution to force Trump to not invade Greenland (which he has no intention to do anyway). The actual deal setting up the vote for independence on the part of the people of Greenland referendum to be juiced by the goodies promised to them in the treaty that they will be made aware of which was really his plan all along. Said treaty only needing the Senate’s approval and can written any way both sides want.