Go check out the idiot union rep at NASA Watch. The moron can’t even spell his name right. Maybe she’ll threaten to sue me for unfair labor practices, too, for calling her a moron and an idiot. Sorry, dear, but truth is an absolute defense against libel.
(Sorry, no permalink–maybe Keith will move this to Spaceref so future viewers of this post can find it).
And hat tip to Mike Puckett in the comments section of this post.
[Update at 9 PM PST]
I should add that I found this particular part the most moronic (and sadly, typical of leftist thinking):
You have either missed the point of the Bulletin, or you are trying to stifle Freedom of Speech.
Once again, we’re not allowed to critique dumb commentary without being accused of “stifling Freedom of Speech.” As though by the mere act of criticism, the perpetrators of free speech have been hustled off to the gulag, to speak no more.
Here’s a quarter, Virginia. Go call someone who gives a damn.
[Update on Saturday morning]
Clark Lindsey has some further thoughts (scroll down, though the beginning part about potential Centennial prizes is worth a read, too):
It also brings up the serious topic of the brother-in-law effect commonly cited by space startup companies. A potential investor initially shows great enthusiasm and seems ready to write a check but a few days later backs off after talking to a brother-in-law or other contact who works at NASA. The NASA person typically knows little about the project but bashes it anyway and influences the investor against it.
I’ve heard that the military has rules forbidding employees from expressing any such personal judgments about commercial products of possible military use because of potential conflicts of interest. Similar rules should be placed into the next NASA budget authorization.