9 thoughts on “Our Post-Racial President”

  1. says that we have to defend ourselves against those white males.

    Click the link; he said no such thing.

  3. I need to teach one of my wife’s potted plants how to comment here, so Jim will have a chance of winning an argument.

    Not a good chance, but a better one.

  4. says that we have to defend ourselves against those white males.

    Click the link; he said no such thing.

    That’s right, Jimmy. Dunham isn’t intelligent or educated enough to say anything that doesn’t scroll up on his teleprompter, but it’s more than that now: he’s a-skeert. He knows that the Ayers/Daley/Wright cabal will use him up, throw him under the bus, and trot out a New Obama in 2012 for you to get moist and tingly over; he’ll be lucky if they allow him to sneak out of the country.

  5. Let’s see. He mentions every color but white and specifically mentions woman… yer right Jim, he said no such thing /sarc

  6. Jim has a point — Obama could have been singling-out Native American men. But that seems unlikely in view of his recent, uh, “shout-outs.”

  7. Maybe he doesn’t like votes from older white, oriental and native American men. I will remember that come November. Who needs a racist, sexist president?

  8. He asks for nothing from me, and he shall receive it. In abundance.

    […]

    Oh, I know he expects me to pay higher taxes to support his leviathan State, but he didn’t ask.

  9. Click the link; he said no such thing.

    Once again, just as in the Bush and Clinton years, we’re supposed to superficially focus on what the President said, ignoring even the natural implications of those words. And we surely shouldn’t look at what his administration is doing. I also find it ironic how so many of his initial problems, mentioned in the speech, (economy in crisis, diminished US status, etc) remain true.

Comments are closed.