Call Your Congressperson

Both the Space Access Society and the Space Frontier Foundation have put out political action alerts. From SAS:

Political Action Alert:

Defend NASA Commercial Crew and NASA Space Technology in the FY’12 Budget

Action Summary:

Contact your Representative by Friday morning at the latest, and ask that they tell the Appropriations Committee that they support full funding for the NASA Commercial Crew and Space Technology programs. (Scroll down to the “Background” sections for more on why these and why now, and “Action Details” for specifics on how to proceed.)

Background: The Process

The Fiscal Year 2012 Congressional budget process is getting underway. (The budget process will be ongoing for the next few months, since FY’12 begins this coming October 1st.) All budget “appropriations” bills (where they write the actual checks) start this process in the House Appropriations Committee, generally in whatever Subcommittee covers the specific budget area.

NASA is funded by the House Appropriations Committee’s Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee. At some point in the coming weeks, this CJS Subcommittee will do a “markup” (a rewrite) of the White House FY’12 NASA budget proposal. This will be the next critical step in the FY’12 NASA budget process.

This is a budget-cutting year. The CJS Subcommittee’s overall money allocation for FY’12 is down 6% from their FY’11 final total. The total of FY’12 White House requests for CJS funding items adds up to a 7% increase over FY’11. (The WH FY’12 request for NASA within the CJS total is $18.7 billion, up 1% from FY’11’s $18.5 billion.)

In other words, when the CJS Subcommittee does its markup, it will have to cut the various White House CJS requests by an average of over 14%. It’s going to get messy. Any item not strongly defended could be vulnerable.

Background: Why These Programs?

Here are descriptions from draft appropriations request language of what we’re asking you to help defend – the NASA Commercial Crew and Space Technology programs:

“NASA Commercial Crew Program – When the Space Shuttle retires this summer, America will be wholly dependent on Russia to launch our astronauts to the Space Station, sending nearly $400 million overseas each year. Commercial Crew will competitively fund the fastest-possible development of safe and affordable made-in-America vehicles, creating thousands of American jobs and enabling full use of the Space Station. We strongly support full funding of the requested level of $850,000,000 in FY2012.”

“NASA Space Technology Program (STP) – America must invest in new technology to stay ahead of foreign space powers like Russia and China. NASA’s Space Technology Program, which now includes Exploration Technology Development and Demonstration (ETDD), is NASA’s primary cutting edge R&D initiative. STP/ETDD funding enables NASA’s research centers and America’s small businesses and innovators to assure America’s leadership in space. We support funding at the requested level of $1,024,200,000.”

Background: Why Now?

The Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee leadership has decided to poll their Congressional colleagues this week to get a preliminary idea of what items under CJS jurisdiction the rest of the House of Representatives thinks should be cut or increased. The response should have a considerable impact on the eventual CJS Subcommittee markup (currently scheduled for early July.) That means that if you can persuade your Representative this week to actively support NASA Commercial Crew and NASA Space Technology, it will significantly improve the chances of proper funding for these (in our view) extremely useful programs.

We already made clear a few weeks back what we think should be cut. (Our understanding is that you all made an impression, by the way. The CJS Subcommittee is now definitely aware there’s opposition to the SLS earmark. Thanks!) This week, the nature of the process is such that suggestions for cuts will diffuse our effectiveness. Our greatest leverage lies in pushing positively for the items we do NOT want cut.

Two final points:

– The House is not in session this week; many Representatives are back in the home district. If you look up your Representative’s local office, call, and find out what their schedule is, you may be able to ask their support for this in person, at a “Town Meeting” event, or possibly even at a personal appointment to meet them.

– We’d really like feedback on what results you get. When you make contact, ask the staffer involved to take your contact info and get back to you with what your Representative decides to tell the CSJ Subcommittee this week. Then drop us a brief email with the name of your Representative and what they did (or did not) get back to you with. If you can do this, it will be hugely useful in the coming months. Thanks!

Action Details:

– Call your Representative via the House Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. (If you don’t already know their name, grab an old utility bill and look them up via your 9-digit zipcode at http://www.house.gov/zip/ZIP2Rep.html.)

– Tell whoever answers the phone that you’d like to speak to the person who handles NASA appropriations issues for the Congressman/woman. Ask for that staffer’s voicemail if they’re not available. (If you’re given a choice between a NASA person and an Appropriations person, go with Appropriations.)

– Politely tell that staffer your name, that you live in the Congressman/woman’s district, and that you support full funding for NASA’s Commercial Crew and Space Technology programs. Then ask them to send requests for full funding for these two programs to the House Appropriations Committee’s website before the Friday 6 pm deadline.

If they have any questions about how to do this, tell them they can get help with the language and procedures to use by contacting (if they’re a Republican) Tony DeTora in Congressman Rohrabacher’s office at x5-2415, or (if they’re a Democrat) Eleen Trang in Congresswoman Lofgren’s office at x5-3072.

(We are, by the way, impressed with the high average intelligence of the people who support our cause. Please don’t damage the cause by either attempting to mess with the above-mentioned website, or by contacting directly the two already-overworked abovementioned staffers. Seriously.)

– Politely ask your staffer if they would get back to you and let you know once your Representative decides what to tell the Committee. Leave them your contact info, phone or email as you prefer. Answer any other questions they may have as best you can, then thank them for their time and ring off.

– If you don’t get any feedback from the staffer by Friday afternoon eastern time, call them again and ask what the status of your request is. If you do get any feedback at all, please pass it on to us in a brief note to space.access@space-access.org. Anything you can come up with now will be a huge help over the coming months.

Thanks!

Perspective:

This is an important early step in the months-long Congressional funding process. Your calls could make a big difference in how much money there is in FY’12 for the things we strongly support at NASA: Commercial Crew & Cargo, Commercial Reusable Suborbital, Exploration Technology, Space Technology, Propellant Depots, etc – all things that bear on lower cost space transportation for the future.

We’ve lived through decades when the fraction of NASA’s space budget we saw as usefully spent was around 1% – and that was in a good year. The current FY’11 Exploration total ended up 21% potentially good stuff, give or take. 21% beats 1% handily… If we can improve on that 21% for next year, we’ll have done well. But if we don’t fight, if we sit back and take things for granted, that useful percentage could easily drop to single digits, or nothing at all. One phone call from you could make the difference.

From the SFF:

Call Before Noon on Friday, May 20th to Have Your Voice Heard

Dear Commercial Space Advocate,

The U.S. House of Representatives’ Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies has asked your Member of Congress for their input on what programs in NASA (and other agencies) should receive increased or decreased funding in FY2012. This gives you an opportunity to have your Representative support vital NASA initiatives like Commercial Crew and Space Technology.

Call your Representatives’ office in Washington, D.C. ASAP (before noon on Friday, May 20th.)

Ask to speak to the staff person who handles “NASA appropriations” and ask that staffer to take two actions:

1. Submit a request to the House Appropriations website recommending that the Committee fully fund NASA’s Commercial Crew program in FY2012 at the President’s requested level of $850 million.

2. Submit a request to the same website recommending that the Committee fully fund NASA’s Space Technology (including Exploration Technology) program in FY2012 at the requested level of $1.024 billion.

Here are the detailed steps for how to your Member of Congress to take action:

1. If you don’t know who your Congressman is, go to http://www.house.gov/htbin/findrep?ZIP and enter your zip code. This will tell you who your Representative is (and remember it for next time).

2. Call your Congressman’s office in D.C., either using a direct number from their website or a directory you have access to, or the House Switchboard at (202)225-3121. Don’t bother to send an e-mail or fax; that won’t work this time.

3. Ask to speak to the legislative staff member who handles “appropriations for NASA.” Don’t just talk to whomever answers the phone. Politely ask to speak to the right staffer, because you need to tell them how to do what you want done.

4. If they tell you “Sally handles appropriations and Joe handles NASA,” you want to talk to Sally, because this is an appropriations issue. Of course, if Sally isn’t available, go ahead and try talking to Joe!

5. Once you’ve got the right person on the phone, tell them that you support full funding of NASA’s Commercial Crew and Space Technology programs at the level requested in the President’s budget ($850 million and $1.024 billion respectively).

6. Ask them to submit, on your congressperson’s behalf, full funding requests for these two programs via the House Appropriations Committee’s website before the 6 pm deadline on Friday, May 20th.

7. To make their job easier, tell the staffer they may contact Congressman Dana Rohrabacher’s or Zoe Lofgren’s office for a copy of the specific language to use for these two funding requests. Congressmen Rohrabacher and Lofgren are two of our biggest supporters of Commercial Crew and Space Technology, and are currently putting together a Congressional letter endorsing these programs. The people to contact are Tony DeTora in Congressman Rohrabacher’s office at x5-2415 and Eleen Trang in Congresswoman Lofgren’s office at x5-3072.

8. Politely ask the staffer to follow-up with you. Most likely the staffer will have to check with their boss before making these funding requests anyway. Tell them that you want to publicize their boss’ support for commercial space. Ask them to call you or send you an e-mail after they fill out the request forms, or to tell you that they can’t (and hopefully why). If you haven’t heard from them by Friday at noon, call the office back and ask what the status of your request is.

9. Let everybody know that you just took action for commercial space. Email the Foundation at Aaron.Oesterle@spacefrontier.org, and let us know what you found out. Cross post or tweet this alert with a link to where you read it and tell your followers, “I stood up for commercial space, and you can too!”

Additional Information:

If you need arguments as to why Commercial Crew and Space Technology deserve full funding, here are the draft descriptions from the appropriations request language:

NASA Commercial Crew Program – When the Space Shuttle retires this summer, America will be wholly dependent on Russia to launch our astronauts to the Space Station, sending nearly $400 million overseas each year. Commercial Crew will competitively fund the fastest-possible development of safe and affordable made-in-America vehicles, creating thousands of American jobs and enabling full use of the Space Station. We strongly support full funding of the requested level of $850,000,000 in FY2012.

NASA Space Technology Program (STP) – America must invest in new technology to stay ahead of foreign space powers like Russia and China. NASA’s Space Technology Program, which now includes Exploration Technology Development and Demonstration (ETDD), is NASA’s primary cutting edge R&D initiative. STP/ETDD funding enables NASA’s research centers and America’s small businesses and innovators to assure America’s leadership in space. We support funding at the requested level of $1,024,200,000.

Well, what are you waiting for? Get going.

[Cross posted at Competitive Space]

10 thoughts on “Call Your Congressperson”

  1. Hell, why not. It’s not like as a nation we’re nearly bankrupt. Let’s borrow another two billion dollars from China in order to have the government replicate what dozens of private start-ups are developing on their own dime.

    After all if it wasn’t for decades of massive government spending, aircraft technology won’t have made it past Kitty Hawk.

  2. We warned you.

    When the President voiced enthusiasm for commercial space development, it didn’t mean he suddenly found an industry he liked. It meant that his intention was to spend as little money on space as possible. Talking privatization was simply a way to get large space budgets off the table.

  3. When the President voiced enthusiasm for commercial space development, it didn’t mean he suddenly found an industry he liked. It meant that his intention was to spend as little money on space as possible. Talking privatization was simply a way to get large space budgets off the table.

    What in the world are you talking about? This has nothing to do with the White House. It is a request to Congress to fund the president’s budget request.

  4. “The CJS Subcommittee’s overall money allocation for FY’12 is down 6% from their FY’11 final total. ”

    Now if we could get that done for the whole budget, we may have a chance to avoid national bankrupcy. Provided it sticks.

  5. Mr Simberg wrote: “What in the world are you talking about? This has nothing to do with the White House. It is a request to Congress to fund the president’s budget request.”

    With all due respect, sir, there’s nothing easier to cut in tough times than a subsidy. And there are no jobs at stake that anyone can specifically promise to their constituents, so no Congressperson is going to lose much sleep over it. If the White House truly cared much about this, they’d have made a real issue of it. But that only happens when any White House is actually serious about something, instead of relying on well-tested platitudes.

  6. I’m sorry for not being clear.

    Any “reasonable investment” in commercial activity can be misinterpreted as a subsidy by someone looking for an easy score. Then too, any program needs the support of two or three Congresspersons and Senators who have adopted the issue as their personal principled position – the one they’ll keep despite all pressure. It doesn’t help to have nebulous statements of, “Yeah, I guess that makes sense.” What you need are politicians known for being the program’s champions. These will be ever ready to make a speech or call a news outlet to give them a quote.

    You must rely on these legistlative heroes to do the hard work of politics – it is their opinions who really matter to Congressional colleagues and their deals that will garner votes. Constituent calls to otherwise uncommitted Congressmen will help, but only at the margins of an already existing backroom deal.

    I have had some years observing and occasionally assisting in the defense of a specific principle – the Fly America Act. There are solid arguments for maintaining a national commercial air capability second to none. But that never stops the “internationalists” from nibbling at the edges, nor does it satisfy those folks who would just as soon not admit to American exceptionalism of any sort. We Fly America proponents are careful to avoid the idea of subsidies in any form. That doesn’t stop opponents from claiming that Fly America is the essence of a subsidy.

    So, just saying…

    Value your legislative heroes and don’t trust Administrative promises unless they are backed up by very public, very sustained support. And good luck.

Comments are closed.