12 thoughts on “Anti-Space Idiocy”

  1. No, I think there’s sufficient entertainment value there. Though he certainly forgot to include global warming (he’s probably slapping himself from that oversight. With a closed fist.)

    The best is actually this gem from a comment:

    One rogue comment can ruin your whole species!

    1. Gil Heron is smoking crack with the devil now.

      BTW, he was a known heavy drug user and reputed to have contracted aids from unsterilized needles,

  2. And I can’t help but notice that half the post is two ugly poems. Don’t these people have editors?

    1. Well, Karl…editors enough till they would not allow my mildly and I do mean mildly critical post.

  3. I am going to use my contacts to find out what the extent of Thiroux’s service.

    I will bet he is greatly exagerrating his status as a combat vet.

    This guy reeks of pogue, aka FOBBIT.

  4. I demand that the Huffington Post apologize immediately for printing — repeatedly — that vile racist slur (the W word), which I and all my people find infinitely offensive.

    From now on, if they allude to it at all, they must refer to us by the name we prefer: the Master Race.

  5. The problem is that the post author has a point. I certainly agree that the best way to prosperity for everyone is space development – but Apollo (to which all that referred) has nothing at all to do with that, and neither has Shuttle. What it had to do with was buying votes for Congressmen. And of course, a Cold War publicity stunt – which admittedly might have been necessary.

  6. For the life of me I can’t understand why people are opposed to “joyrides for millionaires”. Even if you’re a redistributionist you should support whatever gets the money out of the rich guy’s hands and into the working smo’s hands right? Who do you think is building these vehicles?

    Of course, I know the answer.. win-win exchanges don’t exist in the minds of redistributionists. People don’t “need” joy rides and the only legitimate means of distribution is according to need – preferably with force.

Comments are closed.