Why they (that is to say, we) are winning.
[Update a while later]
Peter Gleick and America’s [other] dumbest criminals.
Can’t remember where I saw it (it was recently) but I like “realists” instead of “skeptics” (or “denialists”).
I got a kick out of Judith Curry’s post with Joe Bast (head of Heartland), who freely gave her more juicy inside info than Peter Gleick managed to get through identity theft and wire fraud.
If we’re winning, do we get to have our light bulbs back?
When lightbulbs are outlawed, only outlaws . . .
I like the non-religion and non-climate change crap they used to do. USED to make me think, Now? I know they are just as judgmental and arrogant as all of the people they think they are “SKEPTICAL” against.
They are very skeptical about things that they don’t believe in.
Even in failure, those who are correct, and those who produce can always eventually return. That standard is value, not what is allowed, but what can be done. Best they can do, is to delay.
This is an excellent presentation by Richard Lindzen. Mostly about feedback. Highly recommended. From Pournelle.
Also this from David Evans at wuwt.
Thanks, Curt. Good stuff.
Comments are closed.
©2001-2013 Transterrestrial Musings | Powered by WordPress with Easel
| Subscribe: RSS
| Back to Top ↑
Switch to our mobile site