6 thoughts on “The Manhood Of The West

  1. Tim

    Until the obese middle age leftist women public school teachers and their associated ilk realize that those “gelded”, “emasculated” men they helped produce is all that is standing between them and their new Muslim overlords. In the end natural selection which works on the level of cultures, mores, etc, as well as genetically will win out one way or another.

  2. Gregg

    One of the masculine attributes missing here is the instantaneous defense of the innocents who are attacked, of women and of children. This event nicely encapsulates all that is wrong with the lefty-Socialist-Big Government point of view.

    The very first thought that entered my mind when I heard this story this morning was that the above masculine attribute used to exist for the simple reason that children meant survival…of both the adults and the tribe or species. Children were valuable and as only women could bear children they were valuable, and both had to be protected even if some of the defenders expired in the defense.

    And before some of you blow a gasket, no that is NOT their only value. But survival is a pretty valuable thing.

    But for decades lefty thought has directly attacked the value of women and children – with a War on children.

    You can’t even open a door for a lot of women today – forget about defending them.

    A society which looks the other way as millions of fetuses are destroyed every year – most for no other reason that they are inconvenient – or as Obama says – Punishment:

    “I’ve got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

    ……..is a society that does not value children.

    I happen to be Pro-Choice – which means exactly that – CHOICE. But I don’t like the casual tossing away of millions of inconveniences. And I am absolutely against late term abortion.

    It should be as the Democrats said (but never meant) it should be:

    Rare.

    You have eco-nutrolls pushing for zero population growth. Too many people on the earth, they say. Don’t have so many kids!

    Well if you don’t value kids then there’s no need for musculature to protect them. And if you don’t want children, and in fact view them as inconveniences or punishment, then there’s no need for special protection and preservation of women even at the cost of the lives of males.
    “Women and children first!” is tossed overboard as emasculated, frightened men elbow them aside in a crazed, wild-eyed, headlong dash for the lifeboat.

    And when the lefty War on Children is over, you are left with the “Montreal Massacre” as discussed by Mark Steyn.

    At the École Polytechnique one M Lépine ( who was born Gamil Gharbi) orders the men in a classroom to leave, whereupon he shot the women:

    “The defining image of contemporary Canadian maleness is not M Lépine/Gharbi but the professors and the men in that classroom, who, ordered to leave by the lone gunman, meekly did so, and abandoned their female classmates to their fate—an act of abdication that would have been unthinkable in almost any other culture throughout human history. The ‘men’ stood outside in the corridor and, even as they heard the first shots, they did nothing. And, when it was over and Gharbi walked out of the room and past them, they still did nothing. Whatever its other defects, Canadian manhood does not suffer from an excess of testosterone.”

    Perhaps a trifle hard on all Canadian males but the universities of the world are not known for their brawny, gritty rough men ready to fight and die to protect women and children.

    I was sad to hear Cameron order the Army to refrain from wearing it’s uniforms in public. If I were Prime Minister, I’d encourage the wearing of the uniform in public complete with side arms.

    And of course this story nicely illustrates that when seconds count the police are only (20) minutes away.

    Good show lefty morons…well played.

  3. Tim

    http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/05/excusing-the-men-who-ran-away/

    Well in England today…if someone had attacked the murders with a knife to say nothing of a gun, they would have probably been lucky to avoid farmer Tony Martin’s fate, charged, convicted and incarcerated themselves, even if they had managed to save the soldier’s life.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Martin_(farmer)

    Although a Piers Morgan would doubtlessly say, we with our 85 gun deaths a year (more than half of which are suicides) have no business lecturing England (or Canada) about self-defense. As far as I can tell they seem happy with their system, and regards incidents like this as unfortunate anomalies.

    1. PeterH

      I can’t call a society civilized when self defense is criminalized like that. Removing demonstrated destructive elements is one of those refinements required for survival in a group.

      What’s the status of jury nullification over in England? I understand the US jury system that allows it derives from British Common Law.

Comments are closed.