Obama’s Five Disconnects

…as pointed out by Mickey Kaus:

Does Obama recognize that his initiatives have a weak connection, and even perverse connection, with actually achieving his goal? I hope his biographer, Jonathan Alter, will tell me. But either way, there’s a vacuum between his speechmaking and governing. Is that unusual? After all, Democrats have campaigned for years by arguing that Republican policies benefit the rich–think of all the distributional tables Democrats distributed to fight Reagan’s budgets-without ever saying how much inequality, exactly, they’d be willing to tolerate.

But Obama isn’t vague or incoherent. He’s quite precise about where he wants to go–namely back to something like what we had three decades ago. If his means don’t come close to matching his ends, if they even subvert them, that seems a more troubling, almost pathological mismatch, in which liberalism becomes a sort of cargo cult whose mechanisms have zero hope of achieving the desired results.

Yes, it is a cargo cult, driven by magical thinking.

One thought on “Obama’s Five Disconnects”

  1. The old-time libertarians didn’t call it “the Cult of the State” for nothing. Join up, and before long, you, too, could be transformed into a mindless script-bot like you-know-who. (Clue: He regularly posts here with the regurgitated party line du jour.)

Comments are closed.