12 thoughts on “The IRS Intimidation”

  1. have any political influence

    If your goal is political influence, why pass yourself off as a social welfare organization?

      1. At some point MoveOn.org split itself into two parts, MoveOn Political Action (a political action committee) and MoveOn Civic Action (a 501c4 social welfare organization). “People who favor limited government” are free to do the same.

        1. Then there is OFA and a multitude of other Democrat front groups. Will they all be held to the same standard? Will the Tides Foundation keep their tax status? Because it looks like friends of the administration get special treatment while everyone else gets the shaft.

          Will Obama use executive powers to selectivly enforce this rule like he does others?

          This is just another case of one set of rules for Democrats and their friends and another set of rules for everyone else.

          Tea Party groups are in good company. MLK was targeted by the IRS under a Democrat administration too.

        2. So, I go to Moveon.org website, and the first thing it says is: “Democracy in Action” with the first article “Governor Christie, it’s time to resign”. That looks like political advocacy to me. Indeed, Moveon.org specifically states that Moveon.org is “A joint website of MoveOn.org Civic Action and MoveOn.org Political Action.” Joint? The freedictionary website defines joint this way: “A place or part at which two or more things are joined.”

    1. Oh, ours doesn’t involve guns.

      Really? Searched “IRS Raids”, and found this: A cabbie at the garage told a Globe photographer that the IRS agents drew their guns and instructed everyone inside the mammoth garage to put their hands up during the raid yesterday afternoon.

      It’s a two step process, but guns get involved.

  2. Because, Jim, “People who support -unlimited- (or, at least, -more-) government” is -already- ruled ‘non-political’.

    You’re making the argument that “We want more unemployment benefits!” is -non- political, and that the argument “We want -less- unemployment benefits!” is political.

    AKA: “Opposition to me is political.”

    1. You’ve hit the nail on the head, Al. My liberal friends say CNN is unbiased and Fox is biased. They can never see through their own filters.

      Jim has the same problem, he can’t understand that his thinking is biased, too.

Comments are closed.