9 thoughts on “Pledge Today”

1. HA! Classic!

   But, really! She’s a woman of the people. She lost almost half of her $50 million income [with Hizzonor Bill] to taxes, so she can relate to the suffering of the common people. Her daughter is so in tune with The People, she can’t even be bother to consider the numbers relating to the purchase of a common NYC bungalow.

   Let them eat cake, indeed.

2. Heh. One nitpick: 501c4s aren’t tax-deductible, Save the Plutocrats must be a 501c3.

   1. Lerner lied, as usual.

   2. That’s the whole point — Hillary Clinton’s org makes that claim . . .

3. More Hillary satire:

   http://www.imao.us/index.php/2014/06/cartoon-of-the-day-accomplishments/

4. Is your problem with her that she’s wealthy or she’s a dem?

   1. My problem with her is that, like you, she is a douchenozzle.

      But at least she does it under her own name.

      1. Not only that, but unlike the Douche Guy, she seems to have an IQ above moron level. Of course, the smarter the statist power-junkie, the more dangerous: which is why “President Ratched” would probably be even more dangerous to liberty than “Il Dufe.”

   2. My problem with her, douche, is that she’s a statist mother*cker (as Samuel L. Jackson would say, if Samuel L. Jackson were a libertarian). Besides the suspicion that it is ill-gotten, her wealth only bothers me to the extent tha, unlike the hated Koch brothers, rich “liberals”* use their wealth to expand the power of the State and diminish individual liberty. If they were really interested in helping poor people, they could, you know, just give that money to poor people.

      *and by “liberals” I mean of course “tax-happy, coercion-addicted, power-tripping State-fellators.”

Comments are closed.