7 thoughts on “Hillary’s Appeal Is Growing More Selective”

  1. Return $225,000? How cute. Do the students have any clue the type of people they are dealing with?

    1. “Do the students have any clue the type of people they are dealing with?”

      No. Which is why they stupidly vote for them

      1. Sadly, I think all too many of them know what they are dealing with and that is why they vote for them.

    2. Hmm, UNLV as in Las Vegas.

      Don’t the casinos routinely return large sums lost by gamblers out of compassion for their families and for good PR for their industry?

  2. I am sure Hillary has lots of good things to say about life lessons and what not but I don’t think she will be spilling the beans at these types of gatherings. And she doesn’t have any accomplishments that merit this type of pay for fluff speeches.

  3. $225000 for what, maybe 40 minutes of actual work? A pay rate that is a very VERY LARGE multiple of the typical / average / median pay in the general population. So, how exactly does this fit in with the recent focus on socially dangerous pay disparities? That was a narrative line, that, IIRC, was being pushed by mostly liberal commentators. Did Hill change parties while I was out getting a sammich? Good to know where her sympathies lie, I suppose: with the rich.

    1. Surely you jest. These people are not about consistency of principles. Yes they can talk up a storm about how income disparity is the second greatest problem ever encountered by humanity (the first being AGW of course), and yet charge outrageous fees to students (who are paying those fees through student loans they will be hurting to pay back later) without so much as a moral hiccup. Hillary (by putting up with both Bill and Obama) earned the right to screw these kids into the ground. The 6 figure speaking fees go with being in the inner circle of power for all those years. Being part of the elite means never having to worry about how your actions effect other people. It explains much about their policy choices.

Comments are closed.