Speaking of modest proposals, check out this totalitarian feminist:
I believe we must remove men from the community and place them in their own specific sections of society, akin to subsidised or state-funded reservations, so they can be redefined. We can make not only men safer, but women as well. By subsidising said reservations through the state we can provide men with activities, healthcare, entertainment, shelter, protection, and everything that one could ever require in life. This will remove conventional inequality from society. By reducing the number of men to 10 percent of the total population, their socio-biovalue will be raised. They will live out their lives happily and safely, and male disposability will be a thing of the past.
I can’t wait.
Another theory thought up between bong hits in the freshman dorm. She sure is leaving little room for employment opportunity.
This is why we need holodecks ASAP. We move these demented woman into one so they can believe they’ve sent all the men away. Then we let them wonder why their holomen breeding stock doesn’t seem to be doing the job for them.
Silly woman. Doesn’t she realize that if you subsidize something, you get more of it?
Recall the movie Planet Earth?
Spoken like a woman who believes food comes from the grocery store, energy comes from the gas station and utility department, and that buildings and roads materialize all by themselves. In other words, a moron.
And I guess she thinks the garbage just magically disappears overnight, and the grass grows only so long and then stops.
(Yes, I know a few women work as garbage collectors, and more than a few cut grass, but those and other practical jobs are done mostly by men.)
And when her toilet stops up? I’ll bet she thinks she should call a Ph. D. to fix it. A female Ph. D. at that (probably in feminist studies).
There are both women AND men who think this way. They’re useless idiots and a complete waste of precious oxygen.
1man can barely produce enough economic excess to take care of a single western woman’s insatiable consumption needs. I think the genesis of the foulest of human immoralities, the institution of slavery, is strongest in the female desire to be worshipped, adored, and bowed down to.
If there was justice and karma in the universe, she would drown in her bong water. But unfortunately there is not, and she must be fought by better men and women.
http://thejuma.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/in-our-face/
A lot of people take for granted that electricity will be there at the flick of a switch. They either don’t know or don’t appreciate the vast number of people – almost all men – who work to make electicity possible. From the coal miners, the gas drillers, the metal minors who make the wire for generators and power lines, to the power plant operators and linemen who produce and deliver the electriciy, there are huge numbers of men working to make modern life possible. It isn’t that women are incapable of doing these jobs, it’s the simple fact that few women have the desire or ability to do them. Without electriciy, we’d be back in the 1800s. The same applies for all of our modern utilities – they’re almost exclusively the product of men. Without these men, everyone would literally be shivering (or sweltering) in the dark.
It’s the same for food; it doesn’t come from the grocery store. Yes, there are a lot of hard-working farm women but the majority of the hard work of growing, harvesting, processing, and delivering of food is done by men. Do away with the men and they’d be shivering and hungry in the dark.
The majority of engineers that develop new products and keep existing systems functioning are men. The majority of mechanics and other repairmen are men. The majority of construction and production workers who build everything are men. The list goes on and on. This moronette and would be fascist is dangerously stupid to the point of being evil.
Aw, come on! Lesbian poetry slams are grueling work! Not to mention the backbreaking labor of casting horoscopes and making macrame …
Read the comments at the link. There is some hope that the entire Democrat party doesn’t turn out this way. Makes you wonder what Democrats would think of themselves if the average Democrat actually knew what their activist class was up to.
The sad thing is, the wacked-out agenda of today’s Democrats was on full display in college during my undergrad years. And lest you think that leaves a few decades before it reaches the policymaker level, this was in California.
If she’s pushing these ideas at a college in one of the other 56 states, that means California collegians had it 25 years ago or more.
Yet another reason (if improbable) scenario to support the right of the people to keep and bear arms….I wonder who she thinks will be able to round up all these armed men and castrate them? And I hope to God her three year old isn’t a male child (though she would just as thoroughly f&%k up the mind of any kid she raised, male or female.
Where’s child protective services when you need them?
I know some guys who would be all over this idea….
Some idiots would think they’d be a lucky guy with a harem if 9 out of 10 guys were removed. If this misandrist got her way the “lucky” guys would be slaves to their women.
She has the germ of a good idea, but she’s proposing the wrong method to achieve her laudable goal.
Yes, a 10:1 female-to-male ratio would be beneficial, but the way to get there is to keep the existing men and women and then add nine more nubile, attractive, intelligent-but-submissive young women to the population (perhaps created through use of those artificial wombs she mentioned). The men will be too tired and happy to make war, and the XX people will compete with one another for access to males, thereby selecting for desirable traits (e.g., hyperactive libidos, pleasant dispositions, large, firm breasts, disinclination to wear clothing) and thus improving the human gene pool.
Who’s with me on this!?
Oops.. linky.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf9iTZ433zs
There is enough lack of genetic diversity in the male gene pool as it is. Also if only 10% of the population was male the conflict between females would increase as they would have to compete to even get access to one. The natural ratio is 50%/50% and she is a genocidal imbecile.
In the USA, like everywhere else in the world , there is a severe shortage of organs available for human transplant.
Let’s see if I have her logic straight: if 90% of males are disposed of, then males won’t be disposable anymore?
That is some world-class, jaw-dropping stupid, all rolled up into one paragraph.