The Gaps In Hillary’s Email Traffic

No, there’s nothing “strange” about them. It’s straightforward destruction of evidence, for which this administration is determined to let her skate.

[Update early afternoon]

Hillary, the Democrats and the problem of trust:

…if you think promoting trust in government is important, you should nominate someone trustworthy. But there are other priorities, apparently, and they outweigh that trustworthiness, or we’d have different nominees.

The other way you promote trust is through transparency and accountability. Voters should be able to tell what politicians and bureaucrats are doing, and when those politicians and bureaucrats do wrong they should face real consequences. We’re not doing very well on that front either.

No, we’re not.

[Update a few minutes later]

The FBI agents involved with the probe had to sign special secrecy agreements. Gee, this doesn’t look like the fix was in to let her of the hook and they were worried about leaks at all.

3 thoughts on “The Gaps In Hillary’s Email Traffic”

  1. One commenter pointed out there that the total numbers (see the y-axis) for the Russian traffic is pretty small. That makes the stats far less impressive than they would be. Could just be that particular group didn’t use email.

    1. One data point is not a statistic and can always be explained away but a pattern is something else again. Any person with a functioning brain cell can see they used the state department to enrich their foundation.

      We know there was treason. We don’t know how much. We also know it’s a conspiracy of unimagined proportions. People that are supposed to represent law and order from the ‘opposition’ are a part of it. The rot is unbelievable.

      Imagine Trump to be the worst you can. It doesn’t even register on the Hillary scale.

      1. I basically agree with you. But I have a thing about misleading statistics. Not sure if this is or not.

Comments are closed.